Just an idea,
maybe league should add a feature instead of trying to catch people through chat restrictions and such,
they should just have the people who usually flame instantly muted.
Or have some type of system that would mute players who usually flame automatically for others,
or it would mute flamers from talking to one another so that they can't trigger eachother.
RcGjWO640w1 votesThere's a difference between friendly flame and toxic flame, though and unless you understand context, they looks pretty much identical. with the exception of the occasional "xD" thrown in. You really don't want an automated system trying to account for context.
haha retard1 votesWe use an automated system for instantly issuing bans, I don't see a difference here.
Deep Terror Nami1 votesBecause a ban/restriction is based on a pattern of toxic behavior over many games. What you propose is a punishment for the unreported incidents during a single match. It is actually very different.
Instead of forcing a chat restriction mid-game on the player, individual players can make the choice to mute them. Anyone that doesn't have a problem doesn't have to mute, and the person is not arbitrarily punished.
Now, there is still something between those two; actually reporting a player in the middle of the match. Doing this could result in a chat restriction mid-game. However, the problem with that is people are taking time out of their game to submit reports instead of focusing on the game, which is not something that should ever be promoted. The mute button that currently exists and reporting them after the match is the only reasonable option.
Bídoof1 votesAlso if you mute someone who hard core flames he will just find other ways to piss people off
AFK, inting, stealing cs and jungle camps, etc
haha retard1 votesWell if he didn't know he was muted in the first place, and neither of you could see comms then he wouldn't get triggered.