I'm chat restricted AGAIN??????????? Wtf? 41 games???!!!!?!?!?

dalphy08··5 votes·13,659 views

...........................................................................................................................................and to think that since speaking to the enemy team is at least 95% of the strategy. Way to fuck over my team and make MORE people get chat restricted and/or reported in the process. Because simple logic holds it such that if you can't use certain strategies because of some dumb bot program going around muting people then you end up making more problems.

Admins! Wtf!!!!!!!!

232 Comments

RiotLyte61 votes

Hey,

Sorry for the inconvenience but here's a few chat logs that resulted in your most recent chat restriction:

[4:03] BuddyRydell14: oops [4:19] BuddyRydell14: gay white kids [13:03] BuddyRydell14: stupid trash [17:03] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: u worthless garbage [19:55] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: coward little shit [20:05] BuddyRydell14: and ur a pathetic fool [25:46] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: haha twitch scared like a little bitch [26:52] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: pathetic filth


[20:05] BuddyRydell14: HELP BOT YOU STUPID FUCKS [21:18] BuddyRydell14: u stfu [21:20] BuddyRydell14: garbage kid [21:53] BuddyRydell14: u ran away [21:55] BuddyRydell14: like a piece of filth [22:01] BuddyRydell14: yeah a score has 3 digits [22:05] BuddyRydell14: blind crap headed trash


[3:51] BuddyRydell14: ur not d0ing anytrhing u stupid idiotic loser [4:05] BuddyRydell14: garbage [4:54] BuddyRydell14: way t0 fuck 0v3r mid turret, you fucking pathetic pile of shit [5:02] BuddyRydell14: fucking idiot [10:13] BuddyRydell14: br@nd wtf [12:06] BuddyRydell14: @h my b@d @t t0p b4! [16:35] BuddyRydell14: ur a $tupid idiot brand [20:08] BuddyRydell14: vi why r3p0rt vi, ur vi? [24:26] BuddyRydell14: thx [28:11] BuddyRydell14: it$ this stupid white kid faggot brand afkers fault [32:10] BuddyRydell14: brand shut up u fucked us over at start, piece of trash

We're currently working on systems that will deliver these chat logs automatically with your punishment, so apologies for the inconvenience for now. I will also note that your most recent chat logs have queued you up for an escalated ban review. Please try to tone it down in your next matches.

TeemoJenkins1 votes

{quoted}

Hey,

Sorry for the inconvenience but here's a few chat logs that resulted in your most recent chat restriction:

[4:03] BuddyRydell14: oops [4:19] BuddyRydell14: gay white kids [13:03] BuddyRydell14: stupid trash [17:03] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: u worthless garbage [19:55] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: coward little shit [20:05] BuddyRydell14: and ur a pathetic fool [25:46] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: haha twitch scared like a little bitch [26:52] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: pathetic filth


[20:05] BuddyRydell14: HELP BOT YOU STUPID FUCKS [21:18] BuddyRydell14: u stfu [21:20] BuddyRydell14: garbage kid [21:53] BuddyRydell14: u ran away [21:55] BuddyRydell14: like a piece of filth [22:01] BuddyRydell14: yeah a score has 3 digits [22:05] BuddyRydell14: blind crap headed trash


[3:51] BuddyRydell14: ur not d0ing anytrhing u stupid idiotic loser [4:05] BuddyRydell14: garbage [4:54] BuddyRydell14: way t0 fuck 0v3r mid turret, you fucking pathetic pile of shit [5:02] BuddyRydell14: fucking idiot [10:13] BuddyRydell14: br@nd wtf [12:06] BuddyRydell14: @h my b@d @t t0p b4! [16:35] BuddyRydell14: ur a $tupid idiot brand [20:08] BuddyRydell14: vi why r3p0rt vi, ur vi? [24:26] BuddyRydell14: thx [28:11] BuddyRydell14: it$ this stupid white kid faggot brand afkers fault [32:10] BuddyRydell14: brand shut up u fucked us over at start, piece of trash

We're currently working on systems that will deliver these chat logs automatically with your punishment, so apologies for the inconvenience for now. I will also note that your most recent chat logs have queued you up for an escalated ban review. Please try to tone it down in your next matches.

Lyte I live in Utah, but would love to be involved in Behavior / Player Development, is that something you guys are looking at to help get the queue response times on requests lower?

RiotLyte3 votes

{quoted}

Lyte I live in Utah, but would love to be involved in Behavior / Player Development, is that something you guys are looking at to help get the queue response times on requests lower?

Hm, not the best person to talk to about this. I believe our Player Support teams are mostly with us in Santa Monica if they are dealing with player behavior issues.

Daen3 votes

-snip-

I have to admit, from those chat logs I'm amazed he's not temporarily banned. These comments in particular are...something:

[17:03] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: u worthless garbage [19:55] BuddyRydell14 [ALL]: coward little shit [20:05] BuddyRydell14: HELP BOT YOU STUPID FUCKS [4:54] BuddyRydell14: way t0 fuck 0v3r mid turret, you fucking pathetic pile of shit [28:11] BuddyRydell14: it$ this stupid white kid faggot brand afkers fault

Jubbinaut3 votes

Well, he is up for review for one. Given those logs, I expect he'll receive it.

Jubbinaut2 votes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDkxrMG517M

But thanks anyway, Lyte! Will we be seeing more of you around Misc?

RiotLyte7 votes

{quoted}

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDkxrMG517M

But thanks anyway, Lyte! Will we be seeing more of you around Misc?

I'm hoping that with the system that automatically sends chat logs, we won't have to do this anymore again :)

mvargus2 votes

I can understand your hope that you won't have to issue more "smites" at the same time I think it helps the community to see that there are people at Riot looking at these reports and looking into player behavior.

Sadly, I don't know if you'll ever be able to completely clean up the issues, but I do hope you can reign in most of the problem "children'

FearEngineer1 votes

Hey no need to talk down to them and call them children.

Jubbinaut1 votes

I think the use of quotes in his post indicates that he doesn't actually think of them as children - but still wished to make use of the "problem child" idiom.

I suppose I could be wrong, though.

FearEngineer1 votes

Ah yes, the problem child idiom. What a fool I am.

Jubbinaut1 votes

I guess I'm confused about your concern here, then. The idiom "problem child" doesn't necessarily imply childishness. From Urban Dictionary: "Used to describe any child, employee, sibling, or friend that is constantly getting into trouble but you are somewhat obligated to care for or help. "

Jubbinaut1 votes

I get that "People who care about things I don't care about or are vulgar must be children," was sarcastic.

I get that "It's very important that he doesn't actually think of them as children to imply their childishness," was sarcastic.

What I don't get is what point you're trying to make with all this sarcasm.

FearEngineer1 votes

I just don't like it when people call others children to write them off.

Thanks to your detective work, we now know this wasn't the case here.

Crisis averted :D

Jubbinaut1 votes

{quoted}

There's a condescending connotation. Double entendre of sorts. Idiom or not, players commonly write off others by calling them children. That's what I'm mocking.

So I did understand it correctly. It's true enough that some players dismiss others using that term (the OP himself is a great example), but that's not really what's going on, there. At least, I don't think it is.

So why choose that particular post to comment on?

Can you stop dissecting and overanalyzing the post now?

Wait, so you can overanalyze his comment - to the point of utterly misrepresenting what he's saying - but I can't try to figure out what your issue with it is?

Seems pretty unreasonable.

FearEngineer1 votes

Jubbinaut the reasonable, bless you for all that you do.

mvargus3 votes

I think I started a longer discussion with my use of an idiom than I'd have ever expected.

And Jubbinaut has gotten my usage closer to right. I do use the term "problem child" just to describe anyone who ends up demanding an excess of attention due to little quirks and habits.

BastionKross7 votes

I'm really going to miss a player coming and making a public spectacle about people wanting to know why they're banned and then a Rioter showing up to post his logs for everyone to see. While I know this is time consuming and not an efficient system, I believe it serves an important purpose. Not only to let the players know that punishments are indeed happening, but the chat logs also give specific examples of what will not be tolerated from a player. It may also serve to embarrass the player enough to facilitate rehabilitation.

Perhaps once the system is in place we could get a few public trials like this once in a while, if the player agrees to it.

Jeddy0175 votes

Bro,do you see the crap you be saying? How about putting more focus into playing game than raging in the chat like a spoiled brat?Because raging doesn't do anything besides get you a chat restriction or banned.

OxBaker11 votes

Wow, just permaban the OP. You can tell they are the type of person that acts that way due to it being their nature and will not change.

Shinjusuke5 votes

I commend their willingness to allow reform, but seriously.

One warning. That's it. Then ban the fucker.

It's like the teacher who slaps a bully on the wrist 50 times before actually doing something. It doesn't help, the shitheads are shitheads, and leniency just lets them abuse more people.

zane yalgir1 votes

{quoted}

Wow, just permaban the OP. You can tell they are the type of person that acts that way due to it being their nature and will not change.

im serously getting a 100 chat restriction counts for less then that

lyte. shit players are shit players just like a blue sky is a blue sky or 2+2=4.

i understand you want to protect their unstable little feeding minds but please stop, or at least clearly explain the rules some where so i can give a link to the human trash in brozne. it would be so much more pleasant to play lol if i wasn't having to choose between biting my tongue off in a suicide attempt or as i put it "fuck lyte and his shit systems"

http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/1790679407/211846831?tab=overview

this is a bad game. i was half asleep for it. i can still play well enough to be an adc. only thing i cant do is carry the other 4 like i have in other games when my supp isnt being cooperative.

the problem specifically i had here was annie was clealry going for the kills via last hit, which is okay im lazy and assit gold is still decent gold. every time she would go in becuase i was tired i was pushed into a bad spot so basicly i ended up baking to often from bad plays and got out scaled. if the supp had been more passive or better about what she was doing id have done better and the results woulda looked very different.

i want to be very clear. i was to tired to to carry not to tired to handle my own weight.

IcyPepper6 votes

it would be so much more pleasant to play lol if i wasn't having to choose between biting my tongue off in a suicide attempt or as i put it "fuck lyte and his shit systems"

Excellent way to convey an opinion in a civil manner.

zane yalgir1 votes

{quoted}

Excellent way to convey an opinion in a civil manner.

you forgot to say ":^]" cause we both know you are a troll.

i on the other hand am seious when i say these lyte programs only take from the game play.

first off there is no way in hell you can explaine something important with just 5 lines at the bronze level.

second the dodge que changes went from "okay well i dont have to tolerate this troll" to lyte says "you have to"

thirdly there's 140ish champions ive heard. level 30 and 15 champions is retarded make it 60 champions and that alone will kill smurfing and most of the stupid shit happening in ranked.

IcyPepper6 votes

you forgot to say ":^]" cause we both know you are a troll.

You keep calling me a troll, but never really explain why you think so, whereas I typically explain my point of view on things if it requires more than a simple statement. It certainly makes less sense when I use a little sarcasm to hint that maybe you can get your opinion across with less crude language, because people typically react better when you're civil. Calling me on a troll for a little jab at your lack of tact, however, feels somewhat ironic.

I mean, I could just respond with "stfu you stupid troll" to everything, though I'd certainly misspell more words in an attempt to emulate such behavior. Please don't be that guy who calls everyone a troll who dares disagree with them.

Also, here's a helpful hint:

first off there is no way in hell

This is decent strong language to convey your emotions. Common phrase, not offensive, doesn't reflect on your intellectual capabilities since it's culturally acceptable in North American.

level 30 and 15 champions is retarded

Calling stuff "retarded" makes you look, well, not quite intelligent. You might as well start calling stuff "gay" while you're at it, because people are just going to ignore you either way. You need to convey your opinions with enough tact and thoughtfulness to make your points and not piss them off to the point they really don't care about your opinion.

And stop throwing the word "troll" around. I'm not a troll, I'm a guy who's calling you out. If you can't deal with the heat, then deal with defeat.

zane yalgir1 votes

{quoted}


zzzz criticism with no alternative vs criticisms with alternatives or points of interest.

all you do is attack the person

This is decent strong language to convey your emotions. Common phrase, not offensive, doesn't reflect on your intellectual capabilities since it's culturally acceptable in North American.

this wasn't the topic of discussion its your troll vendetta against me. -_- lyte heads player development if im not mistake which means my attacks on him for not thinking his position on toxic player behavior or "punishments" through are legitimate. ive given cause in effect from a point of view that hasn't been discussed and the fact is hes made a one sided decision with only minor player input is a fact.

ive given three points of interest where riot has missed the point and failed to consider the players pov.

the only point lytes asked for input on is the what. not the all important how to deal with it. thats a god complex it doesnt reflect the players will. -- players dont want to play with feeders. bad games happen. come backs happen. the responsibility for the win or loss lies with the feeder not the people who for what ever reason failed to or couldn't help them. -- players dont want to play with afks. playing a man down isnt fun. basic manners dictate you know you have enough time to play or not. ive had connection issues as att uverse isnt partnered with riot. most of the time its negligible sometimes however i do have to and do give up on playing becuase the issues are so bad. -- players dont like being verbally abused. no one likes being verbal abused. and frankly if you cant take ten seconds or less to read something in the chat about how "you need to stop taking some ones lane cs" or as supp " stop hitting the minions im pulling to open an option for the jungle," then youve made a clear choice to disrespect your fellow player and deserve it. wither you like it or not is irreverent at that point. you choose to be abused in that exact moment its not hard to work with others it is very easy to refuse to. its a team game you refusing to work with the other players is worse then some ones flaming. -- whats the point of a chat where you cant properly answer questions. forcing half answers only adds frustration to the game and to both sides of a conversation.

dodging isnt the problem never was. the reason behind the dodge is a problem. consistently dodging to dodge is punish worthy while dodging one or two lobbies becuase some idiot thinks its funny to say "mid or feed" isnt punish worthy. the current dodging system is extremely hard line and refusing to twik it is simple laziness.

ive had players who have fed for three games in a row. yes the same exact person three times in a row always feeding at the bronze level. thats a ranked restriction if i ever saw it and i know they didn't get one and where mass reported.

http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com http://www.lolking.net/ http://na.op.gg/

three sites of many all will allow you to see how many more they feed. riot has more information theres no reason for them to be unable to tell how often some on feeds -_- under no circumstances is it acceptable to flame is not a proper argument and is what riot has said over and over. the reason it is improper is how short sighted it is.

it doesnt factor ingame play, what some one else said, or and is a one sided defense in favor of the less then pleasant players who are horrible teammates more often then not leeching and doubling another players work before carrying their own. -_- there are clearly defined roles for 5 players/

these are the three carry roles with the most impact on the win or lose in my personal opinion. top is the cc tank more often then not they are responsibly for body blocking or tanking all kinds of damge from turrets to monster to other champions.

mid the cc peel killer. just as it syas there first goal isnt turrets thats jsut a bonus more often then not the good ones will kill peel or suppress the enemy team for allies.

adc the killer peeler turret wrecker. the adcs arent exactly duriable and in ecahnge the do high levels of ranged damge and are best suited for killing turrets. they are best suited for "carrying" games

the assistance. don't under estimate the value of supp roles.

supp. the point of supp is warding dewarding and cc for the team. nothing is better then getting a free win becuase you got the adc a favorable position.

**jnugle. ** controls buffs the more buffs a team has the stronger it is over all. also engages in warding dewarding and assisting the lanes when possible. dragon baron blue red even the water strider can all be called buffs and jungle is the one managing them.

-_- this is the 4th time ive restated a postion lets see if you can properly debate your postion or are the idiot troll i know you are.

Jubbinaut3 votes

[{quoted}](name=zane yalgir,realm=NA,application-id=cIfEodbz,discussion-id=zA3mYB5G,comment-id=0011000400020000000000000000,timestamp=2015-04-13T01:44:23.794+0000)

lyte heads player development if im not mistake which means my attacks on him for not thinking his position on toxic player behavior or "punishments" through are legitimate. ive given cause in effect from a point of view that hasn't been discussed and the fact is hes made a one sided decision with only minor player input is a fact.

From a post by Lyte on Reddit (made 3 days ago):

I'm not the boss or manager of Player Support--I'm a game designer in Game Design ...

zane yalgir1 votes

{quoted}

From a post by Lyte on Reddit (made 3 days ago):

why does he get credited for so much of this bull shit behavior programs then? i really want to know whicih ever socaist idiot is heading them. so i can wish them fired

Jubbinaut4 votes

At a guess? Because he designs a lot of the behavior systems, as well as spearheading a lot of the sociological experiments and studies that inform those systems.

zane yalgir1 votes

{quoted}

At a guess? Because he designs a lot of the behavior systems, as well as spearheading a lot of the sociological experiments and studies that inform those systems.

..... basicly hes the head guy though. i doubt his works different from mine. their are probably a few shitty people who dont do much in the way of work and then lytes like this guy Bernard i work with. all and all as long as i shut my mouth and do as he says its an easy night of work and idc if i miss a few spots in the cleaning cause i know nobody will contest him with out having to address a shit load of other issues they choose to ignore.

Jubbinaut4 votes

Yeah, that would sound likely, except that, as he said, he's not really the head of much.

Honestly? His biggest job seems to be acting as a scapegoat for players who seem determined to blame someone else for something they think is "unfair."

zane yalgir1 votes

{quoted}

Yeah, that would sound likely, except that, as he said, he's not really the head of much.

Honestly? His biggest job seems to be acting as a scapegoat for players who seem determined to blame someone else for something they think is "unfair."

agreed though its less hat i think is unfair and more what i think is stupidity at its finest it feels less liek there trying to improve the game and more like they are trying to force certain things. the dodge changes have me wanting to give rank up all to gather, and i dont play if not for ranked or game mode life urf. ive had new level 30s call me bad becuase they jsut think there the smartest thigns ever and ive been playing for a year now. i know some off these champion the new level 30 use and you dont go q first on nami less your new or a troll as one example ive seen and noted

IcyPepper4 votes

{quoted}

When you see Jubbinaut and Tombdragon start commenting just drop it.

These are people who live to get off on irritating people in the forums, they feed on every chance to misinterpret your words and give you grief.

They don't really want to discuss anything, just argue with as much semantics as they can.

Why? I don't think we even want to know.

Just move on once you see their names~

Wow ouch man.

I just call out bs when I see it, and in this thread the only one misinterpreting words and giving everyone grief is OP. I have my moments, and I can be an ass at times, but I'm a human being and I don't let people trash others. Someone posts a thread about how they should have the right to flame bad players, you bet I'm going to call bullshit and knock them down a peg. Sometimes I'm wrong, sometimes I just get grouchy when commenting and I'm a little salty, but I own up to it when due and try to learn from my mistakes.

But yeah, ouch man.

Karlyr3 votes

The smiting is back on. =D

Raptamei3 votes

summoner 11 BAM

IcyPepper16 votes
  1. How is he not banned yet?

  2. It's starting to become entertaining, in a morbid sort of way.

  3. How many people has he called a psychopath for disagreeing with him?

  4. Is he going to remain silent or will he finally declare his love for me?

Jubbinaut8 votes

{quoted}

  1. How is he not banned yet?

A system that - unfortunately in this case - leans a little on the lenient/forgiving side.

  1. It's starting to become entertaining, in a morbid sort of way.

I always thought it was hilarious, personally.

  1. How many people has he called a psychopath for disagreeing with him?

That would be approximately everyone who disagreed with him, and some who simply failed to explicitly agree with him (I'm included in both groups).

  1. Is he going to remain silent or will he finally declare his love for me?

I've got my fingers crossed for the latter, but that would basically mark the end of the series, so the writers'll probably never do it.

BeatzBoyFTW1 votes
  1. How is he not banned yet?

Maybe Riot would want everyone in the community to be acknowledge for his retarded style I guess?

  1. It's starting to become entertaining, in a morbid sort of way.

It's bleh.

  1. How many people has he called a psychopath for disagreeing with him?

As many as the number of ironies where he proposed he isn't toxic by replying "you a psychopath".

  1. Is he going to remain silent or will he finally declare his love for me?

I'd go for the latter, he would give you the D......if he has any :p

dalphy081 votes

{quoted}

Maybe Riot would want everyone in the community to be acknowledge for his retarded style I guess?

If you could notice something like that, then that would mean you as well as possibly them suffer from psychopathic greed to make oneself look more right in their own eyes because they deep down know that in public image they are always wrong at the hands of the true smartest one: me.

BeatzBoyFTW8 votes

If you could notice something like that, then that would mean you as well as possibly them suffer from psychopathic greed to make oneself look more right in their own eyes because they deep down know that in public image they are always wrong at the hands of the true smartest one: me.

http://mostlulz.com/images/2013/March/2/51f1401ddf868.jpg

Newbert Newman3 votes

From one of those threads:

{quoted}

#"I'm actually a hero in game" -BuddyRydell14

mvargus3 votes

Nice one. I like this. :)

TeemoJenkins12 votes

Sorry I'm late.

Sirsir7 votes

Still not permabanned. Tsk.

Jubbinaut6 votes

From Lyte (emphasis added):

During restricted chat design testing, we tested several variants to ensure that the typical player had enough chat resources to communicate effectively with their team. The current setup (with smart pings) is decent for team communication for most players, although we acknowledge that junglers have a bit more difficulty in the current setup.

What's interesting to note is that many restricted chat players are actually winning more games than they were before being in restricted chat; so, I'm not as convinced as you are that the mode is hurting the rest of the team as much as you might believe.

He also mentioned the rationale that relates to your specific concern (emphasis added):

I think many players forget that this isn't a full mute. A lot of studies went into restricted chat design to determine what is the right amount of chat 'resources' to give a player, and if players used their chat resources only for team play, they actually can manage pretty well. The current design forces negative players to consider whether they value teamplay (and winning!) more than being verbally abusive.. and we find that most players opt to use their chat resources for positive communication and end up winning more games than they did before.

dalphy081 votes

[deleted]

Jubbinaut10 votes

{quoted}

Yeah well listen smartass. It's also interesting to note that they actually aren't. I fully just outlined why, if you had to post that you're either so fucking retarded beyond ALL belief that you actually didn't get why it's worse to be chat restricted., or you're purposely trolling. Either that, or you've never witnessed proper chat tactics in a LoL game before.

Sorry, but I'm gonna have to trust the data over your experiences. I mean, no offense, and in no way should that decision be implied as invalidating your experiences, but you simply can't be seen as representing the norm - because there's only one of you.

To think that I was ACTUALLY THE ONE typing good things and helping out others. And I get fucking restricted for that?

If you were being positive, it's HIGHLY unlikely you'd have received a restriction. And by "highly unlikely," I mean you've got better odds of winning the lottery.

More from [ARCHIVED] Miscellaneous

More by dalphy08