Anyone else agree Crysis 2 sucks?
Honest opinions!! Post fast!!!
Honest opinions!! Post fast!!!
Anyone else agree that BuddyRydell14 is a troll?
Shietty grafix, it's like something out of Atari 2600.
Done.
hmmmm i honestly think it did suck, though a friend of mine said crysis 3 was pretty good
hmmmm i honestly think it did suck, though a friend of mine said crysis 3 was pretty good
Why? And as for Crysis 3 logically it would too based on what I've seen but I've never played it so I don't know from play experience.
honestly crysis 2 has absolutely terrible graphics compared to many other games out right now
honestly crysis 2 has absolutely terrible graphics compared to many other games out right now
It's not ALL about that, but yes they did get a bit (a lot) inferior. But it's the lack of the aliens (not to spoil it), they made it another rip off of the modern COD. Because without the aliens....it sucks and not to mention there was no free roam. AND removal of the ability to lie down (go prone)? I remember some stupid kid had told me "they ah removed eh deh ability to go prone to promote constant battle awareness!!!!!-eh!!!". I was just like no, no. No.
Wonder what type of autism they would have suffered from...and for how long....to even dare think once it could be possible in the world to have Crysis 2 not have the ability to go prone. And they lied in pre release trailers saying you could shoot out the floor tiles and stuff....liars I couldn't do that in-game
bump
bump
Changing the map design from open world dynamic to scripted linear was incredibly stupid. On top of that, I hated the story, largely because of the decisions that were made during the comic (which was one of the worst I've read due to a lot of glaring holes in the story in regards to the actual gameplay). Alcatraz was simply unlikeable, mostly because they introduce him as the token silent protagonist. I mean, it made sense with Nomad in the first game because he wasn't much of a talker to begin with. However, what sets Nomad apart from Alcatraz is that his character is revealed little by little when he spoke. I actually was hoping that Crysis 2 would've picked up where the first game left off, but the game was such a huge disappointment, I refuse to play the third game. Crysis 2 was absolute crap.
P.S. I don't really care so much about the graphics, as long as the game looked fine and ran well. I actually hate how people cr@p on a game simply because of the inability to look pretty in 1080p or some other bulls- - - like that. It's a fairly trivial point.
Changing the map design from open world dynamic to scripted linear was incredibly stupid.
I know. They're just kids that weren't grown up enough for Crysis 1 clearly.
And as for story stuff I can't really say (forgot it :D) but I just hate that there's no aliens (which again is a bit of a spoiler for anyone else reading...), and that they removed the ability to go prone which only further makes the confined levels more irritating to play.
{quoted} P.S. I don't really care so much about the graphics, as long as the game looked fine
Isn't that contradictory o.O
What I meant is that as long as the game didn't look like a hot mess in the visual department (e.g. nondescript blobs, hard corners on otherwise smooth objects...basically, glaring graphical errors)
Yet a lot of people rate games with zero online simply because the game doesn't look super-special-awesome sparkly and "like-real-life-but-not" kind of graphics.