Diana, Garen, Darius, these are some of the anti-fun champions. They are complete nightmares against squishies, like Azir, whom I'm trying to learn, going against a Diana isn't the best experience.
your post is funny, because out of all of those, azir is the most anti-fun
Laning against a Azir as Diana is pure anti fun. Azir being f2p was one of my reasons to stop playing mid and test jungle Diana.
.....Azir destroys Diana.
TL;DR "I'm bad and being bad is anti-fun" -Em El Gee Bruh 2015
Maybe under different circumstances I would have won lane and punished her, but I'm learning Azir, this was my 2nd game as him ever, so I'm not used to being engaged on hard by someone who takes my entire health bar as Azir, my movements aren't good because I'm not sure what to do, and I'm overall a bad Azir player.
On one hand, there are a lot of champs that are designed to punish most of the champs in the game for simply existing. On the other hand, bans exist and you can see what the other teams pick.
Azir has a very clear advantage over all of these, whose main weakness is being kited and poked.
There are many Champion types and all of them have clear disadvantages. Azir's whole point is to win a war of HP attrition and Darius/Garen's is to get in your face and destroy you in 1-2 waves, keep your distance.
Diana shouldn't be able to even touch you pre 6 and when she gets her ult you get yours, which pretty much counters most engages.
its funny because these champions actually have clear patterns and counterplay. the true anti-fun champions are these with little to no counterplay like ekko, rexai, elise, lee sin, vayne etc
