silvers are better than golds regardless of what the ladder says

Genuwhine·10/1/2015, 4:47:59 AM·2 votes·386 views

Diamond player, played in silver and gold this last couple of months. Silver players and gold players both pay no attention, golds have tiny bit better mechanics, silvers can figure out what to do better, silvers actually group up, silvers dont bitch and moan as much when clearly wrong, silvers dont continue to feed horrendously where as golds feed harder and faster . idk I think a mental block i up for all the gold players because this is actually how ive seen the players on average sure there are some outliers but for the main part this sums up how i see the elo's. Golds must have an ego because thats the "rewards" tier even though its not much of an achievement but i think that makes them worse players than silvers.

4 Comments

Kledy McKledFace10/1/2015, 4:55:47 AM1 votes

youre worng the difference between gold and silver in silver they ahve no vision at all

Lord Azır10/1/2015, 5:35:34 AM1 votes

The main things I see in silver is maybe 1 pink ward purchased every 5 games. Even when the entire enemy team is dead they would rather get 1 tower and recall then to rush baron. They play for kills over objectives and dive to get a kill even though they know they will die then say #worth. The struggles of silver are real.

Marthian10/1/2015, 6:43:08 AM1 votes

Not even true at all.

For me, Gold players (heck even Silver II/I players) are actually very competent and WILL punish any mistake you make. They also aren't idiots and roam the enemy jungle alone with no vision.

EllaRyu6910/1/2015, 7:58:18 AM1 votes

might agree, been queued up with silvers and at least one gold player but the gold player tends to feed more, rage more, get baited alot into a 1 v 5, spams "i'm a smurf let me mid/adc i carry" and then proceeds to feed more...

sad but that's the people i've met so don't downvote ;w;