Should surrender times be made earlier?

xXBush Did 911Xx·Aug 3, 2015·1 votes·707 views

For a long time LoL players have had to suffer and to be forced watching enemies annihilate them defencelessly for 20 minutes minimum, personally I think the availability of surrender is too long and causes frustration at times. A better suited system should be if teams are losing a certain score for example something ridiculous such as 15-0 kills in 10 minutes the surrender option should be at availability. Also a 3-2 vote enable the surrender process. That's my personal opinion and concept of a better LoL system please let me know what you think RIOT :)

4 Comments

Deep Terror NamiAug 3, 20151 votes

People already surrender far too easily. This would ruin many many games that would be won otherwise.

ZenithEeveeAug 3, 20151 votes

/ff Timers should change based of how many missing players there are.

If theres 1 missing player, it should be reduced by 5 minutes.

if 2, it should be reduced by 15 minutes

If 3, you should be allowed to surrender on the spot with full loss prevention and no winning rewards...

SetijeAug 3, 20151 votes

The surrender option is really only there in case one team is winning and refusing to kill the nexus because it's funnier for them to pull people out of spawn pool and kill them over and over. In ANY other scenario you should not surrender. In all honesty I think you should need all 5 voted to surrender. If you don't want to give up why should you have to? ALL GAMES ARE WINNABLE and if people could surrender quicker and with less votes then anyone who picks late game champs would have no fun at all. Besides if you are losing its the BEST time to get better. If you don't care about getting better then you shouldn't care about winning because this is a game. Overall if there is a change to surrenders it should take more votes and/or be initiated at a later time.