If Champs Are Really base on Players.

As a fellow member playing ranked. I can't help myself and discuss that the fact how fellow summoners would " Counter pick" a champion base on there kit or how much of a threat they are playing against. For Example:

Playing Any of these high mobile champs makes it unfair for other summoners.

For the Upcoming Patches that will be finalize out of PBE . I'm happy they are nerfing and making them more highly skilled base.

As for and They still appear to Be Top picks/ Ban rate In Rank. Not because of how Difficult there skill base are but how easily they can "Clean up". I Used to be a main but not anymore because of how easily you can get a kill because of his R or Any of these items . Basically what i'm trying to say is that Playing Assassins, You basically need 1 kill to make a comeback in the game.

Example 0-9-2 LV12 with Against 12-0-0 LV14 . That match up, Base on the High scaling ratio and the gap closing. Talon is able out DPS syndra.

Some people may say that every champs are equally fair and it's based on players skills. But then are those Champs that got nerf located ? These Champs i rarely see in Rank because of the nerfs or maybe there are better choices.

I truly believe that 75% of Champs is base a player is a lie. I think its quite the other way around.

I'm 50% on Because of Animation cancel. The other reason is because her passive making it easy to kill people with. Runic Blade scales 20 / 25 / 30 / 35 / 40 / 45 / 50 % of her attack damage as bonus physical damage on her next basic attack.