Boards›Gameplay

I want ARAM to have RANKED :D

The Rage Master·11/9/2016, 4:03:23 PM·4 votes·1,001 views

Imagine, RANKED on ARAM!!!! You get a random champ, fight like crazy, and get lp, divided from the normal 5 vs 5 ranked!!! So u have a rank on ARAM too, and if your ARAM ranked is higher than your 5 vs 5 maybe get a frame <3 awesomeeee!!! [slayer-jinx-wink]

9 Comments

nairuzu11/9/2016, 4:12:41 PM3 votes

I love ARAM :). Riot please hear this.

Sambers11/9/2016, 6:03:05 PM2 votes

You should put the crack pipe down, I don't know how they haven't removed 3v3 let alone add that...

Deep Terror Nami11/9/2016, 4:09:11 PM1 votes

Part of the idea of competitive play is that the match is up the the skill of the players more than random chance. While obviously skill is still a part of succeeding in ARAM, oftentimes the randomness of a bad matchup is insurmountable regardless of how much better the team with the disadvantage is.

The Rage Master11/9/2016, 5:03:10 PM1 votes

I didn't say that it would be as serius as ranked 5 vs 5 guys, I just say that it could have ranking and giving some rewards if you are the king of aram. And wtf with the downvote thing again? Why downvote me for saying "i want aram ranked" ? people have issues i leave boards again. it is toxic

SamsWrath11/15/2016, 11:32:03 PM1 votes

I see one major problem with ranked ARAM but, there's a solution!

The biggest problem is people who make ARAM only accounts so they can get Lux or Varus every game--they would dominate ranked ARAM. Rather than everyone go out and make an ARAM only account so they can compete, I see 3 possible solutions to this problem and I will list them from (in my opinion) least favorable to best:

  1. Give players with more champions more rolls (a fixed number that resets every game)
  2. Limit ranked ARAM to players who own ALL of the champions
  3. Create an ARAM roster system so players can create a customized pool of 40 champs used for ranked ARAM matches

Here are the problems I see with each solution:

  1. Giving players more rolls doesn't guarantee they won't roll a few worthless ARAM champs in a row--especially if they own ALL of the champions
  2. Limiting ranked ARAM to people who own ALL of the champions would significantly reduce the number of people who could queue for ranked ARAM
  3. The ARAM roster system would require Riot add new code and its doubtful they would invest in it

I think the roster system would be best and this is how I envision it:

  1. Player must have a minimum of 40 champions (can use free champs)
  2. Player creates a roster of 40 champs that he/she will use in ranked ARAM games
  3. 10 bans (5 per team)
  4. Random assignment of champs (no two players can have the same champ--same as now)
  5. Players on the same team may trade champs during the champ select as long as the champ to be traded is on both players' champion rosters
  6. No re-rolls

An ARAM roster system for ranked play would allow most players to participate (40 champs isn't that many) and it would keep people with ARAM only accounts from dominating ranked ARAM play. It would also allow for a TON of strategy when queuing with a team.

That's my two cents on ranked ARAM.

Six Sided Star11/9/2016, 4:17:11 PM1 votes

A lot of people that haven't played the game for a long time don't know how to play (or have experience with) all champions, therefore potentially placing yourself in a 3v5, 2v5, etc. I don't see this ever becoming a thing, as fun as it may sound. Now as far as Ranked Draft Mode on the Howling Abyss? That sounds more reasonable and actually quite fun as well. I would personally spam that all day. But again, highly unlikely

Your Real Mom11/9/2016, 4:12:42 PM1 votes

I think it's a fun idea but not practical