IMPORTANT PROPOSAL

Ulfe·Nov 19, 2017·1 votes·222 views

It would be interesting that at the end of each game, the players scored their teammates. Quickly, just by hovering over each one and putting a note from 1 to 5.

With this we could really balance the games, because I'm sure there are players in the Bronze League much better than in the Gold League for example and it's hard for them to climb because of their bad luck with their teammates.

After scoring each player, they will have a personal Ranking that will be used to play against opponents of the same score and at the same time have partners with the same score.

I am sure that the community of players will know how to use this tool well as you can already see with the Honor and the reports.

There are many frustrating games that players have every day because of this lack of distributive tools.

Thanks for your attention.

5 Comments

ZerdunNov 19, 20172 votes

this would also lead to pseudo bullying in the fact that 3-4 man teams could poo all over the odd man out's report. There is a the reason they pulled the player unskilled flag from the game

ZephyrDrakeNov 19, 20171 votes

"hey this guy was the best on my team but i don't like him very much so #5 for me!" "hey we are a 4 man premade group, even though we fed and each of us went 0/99/0 we are going to make the one dude that is not in our group be put all the blame" "i am a lowly support player, nothing i do ever gets recognized so i just end up getting last place every single game" "i am a damage dealer and i did everything well the entire game but positioned poorly one time towards the end now i have been voted last"

UlfeNov 19, 20171 votes

You could not vote for yourself, I think that's common sense. Well, I'm talking about the Solo / Duo classifications, although I think I have not put it in the post before.

I am support and my work is recognized many times. And for an error in the whole game when you have done badly, you have the opinion that many would give a 1, I think not.

Also, I do not say that we have to remove the qualifications that there are now up to S +. That could also be a sum in the final score.

Simply you have a negative point of view. But I think you need something like that.

Because just like you put that negative point of view on this, I put a thousand on how things are now.

Thank you.

ZephyrDrakeNov 19, 20171 votes

{quoted}

You could not vote for yourself, I think that's common sense. Well, I'm talking about the Solo / Duo classifications, although I think I have not put it in the post before.

I am support and my work is recognized many times. And for an error in the whole game when you have done badly, you have the opinion that many would give a 1, I think not.

Also, I do not say that we have to remove the qualifications that there are now up to S +. That could also be a sum in the final score.

Simply you have a negative point of view. But I think you need something like that.

Because just like you put that negative point of view on this, I put a thousand on how things are now.

Thank you.

"hey guys bronze players are totally better than gold ones! they are just unlucky and the gold ones just got lucky!"

UlfeNov 19, 20171 votes

And why do you explain that there are people who do two and three accounts to have three attempts when it comes to making the first 10 qualifying games?

You could try to empathize a little when debating, do you think I say this just to cry? Do not you think you have to improve the players' game a little more?

For you, it's just fine, right?