Aram

Kishin40··1 votes·242 views

10/14/17 Ty for taking your time to read this players of LoL. There is 138 champions and counting but players wouldn’t want to play all of them. While it's true that players wouldn’t own all of them immediately, i still believe that there are some players wish that they wouldn’t champion/s they don’t want to play in aram.There are even articles or some form of text that players type up tiers of champions that are must get, are okay and well we lost. It’s true that players probably didn’t join LoL to play aram but there still are players that play aram. Players should be given the option to ban certain # of champions (like less than five or so) so they don’t get the champion they don’t want to use cause if they do, they will simply reroll which is the purpose of reroll but the chances of them getting a champion they are fine using are slim. Also players can end up dodging the match and get force to wait till time up to be allow to join a match. It’s true that it's possible that a player could have gotten a certain champion that another player would have want to play. In the end, i seen that players consider themselves rather than other players of which champion they would want...unless the player is in a party so they probably won't ban a champion that they party members want. If the ban system not going up then there should be more rerolls than 2 since there’s 138 champions. Despite the choice to report players, there still some players that act unappreciated before players are sent to the field. One of the acts that players do is ignore or reject a trade and reroll the champion that someone probably wanted. As a LoL player who plays a lot of aram, I seen this happen A LOT and it always leaves a negative play but sometimes the player that wanted that champion dodge the match to avoid playing with a player whose attitude is unappreciated. I’m not a expert on coding but i think if it’s possible when someone rerolls a champion that should pop up a text saying “champion’s name is being reroll” then whoever wants that champion can click the trade button and they get that champion with no reject coming. If that code doesn’t get apply then whoever is reading this and plays aram BE NICE. Also there’s that part where a player would say, that champ is my main...would you believe that person and had over that champion? Hope that i don’t get in trouble for saying this but depending on the champion i WOULDN’T. But if you going to reroll that champion, just let that player have it or that player will either be mean towards you or dodge besides if it turns out to be true that this player has a good score of mastery, hey that’s one advantage. I’m not saying it’s unnecessary to be there but i think the skin boost whatever it’s call, should be rethink about the payment for it. Sure, players get a skin for that match along with some bonus IP but people buy skins probably cause they think its cool and all or they want that skin than the one that is original. My point is that people should be allow to buy that with IP or Blue essence if i got that right with the preseason update which goes up in Nov. 8th. What’s the point buying it with IP/blue essence when people get a skin for one match and bonus IP? Well at least you get to play with a skin even if it's one match...hell even i would buy it all the freakin time even if i get a skin i don’t wanna. I can’t remember what else i forgot to type down but if you see what i forgot, please type it down otherwise please type your comments. Ty again for taking your time to read this players of LoL.

5 Comments

Minarde1 votes

Bans would be nice, but mostly as part of a larger initiative to improve ARAM. In a hypothetical ranked queue, bans would add another layer of strategy for competitive players. In the current queue, bans only vaguely help competitive players (due to not addressing more pressing issues, such as ARAM-optimized accounts or incentives) and vaguely hurt casual players (by lengthening champ select).

Kishin401 votes

Ty for leaving a comment. I think that players should be given the choice to ban a selected number of champions like how it is with ranked but individually because if its like ranked then people would rather ban the good ones so that their opponents can't have them. When i typed individually, i meant like before they get into the part where is the champ select (forgot whats that part called for aram) also they can choose to not ban any champs.

Minarde1 votes

The problem with adding personal bans like that is, barring other changes, it exacerbates the "ARAM-optimized accounts" issue. With ranked draft bans, there's the extra consideration of banning champs to prevent you or your team from rolling undesirable picks in addition to, as you said, denying the enemy those champs. However, with individual bans, it's just "ban the weak champs so I can't roll them." It reduces champ variety and randomness, which clashes with the spirit of ARAM.

Kishin401 votes

at least they avoid dodging

More from Gameplay