Could you guys consider changing the surrender vote success requirements to three out of five? It's very frustrating when two team members can effectively waste the time of three other people in a frustrating match. :(
Also, if the folks at Riot are intent on keeping the surrender vote requirements as is, could Rioter please explain the reasoning behind requiring a 4-to-1 vote in favor of forfeiting the match to require end-game?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Kinjishi3 votesAgreed. 3 out of 5 Yes votes is a majority and should qualify as a surrender passing.
Matthias91191 votesLiterally half the comments about surrender are "surrender should be removed" or "surrender should require a unanimous vote", and the other half are "make it 3/5" and/or "let us surrender earlier".
What they have now is a pretty good compromise.
The Ecdysiast2 votesRemoved would be fine, as it would take out the argument completely.
Having two trolls able to lock three honest players into a game they've forced the fun out of is not okay.
woollyGreg1 votesThe only thing Riot is compromising is math. Let's have an election between two people and select the candidate with 40% of the vote because obviously 60% of the population is wrong...
