3-2 Surrender
I would like to suggest that a 3-2 surrender ends the game, or at the least a 3-1 and an afk no vote ends a game. I hear people complain about people who talk trash and people even being perma banned for it, but the most annoying thing by far in this game to me (an i can of course only speak/type for myself here) is when a game is 25-5 we missed both dragons and have one guy afk, I vote for a surrender and get 3 yes one no and one no vote. Now I know better than trying to argue with person who said no, I dont want to get banned, but if three of the 5 players do not want to continue the game, why should the majority of the team have to continue? I do not have the stats in front of me as i cannot be in every game at once, but if a game is 25-4 and surrender vote is put up and is lost 3-2 how many non troll actions have proceeded. Because players are forced to continue despite majority vote they either go afk (reported) , leave the game (Reported), start purposely letting opponents have objectives or feeding (reported), or take the high road play the game which they will end up loosing by a lot, be pissed they had to play the game and be done for the night and walk away unhappy with your product. Now I am sure this has come up before, and I will continue playing League regardless of the result of this topic. This is merely my suggestion to fixing a lot of end game trolling and anger.
-Make Surrenders 3-2 end game. -Make a non vote count as a yes to surrender -Add option to report "Refusing to surrender"
-If none of these put in place consider instead... -Surrenders of 3-2 end game IF team is behind 10 kills or more. -None votes (same as Afkers) change that voting results like a leaver would. - Example if 5 players in game, 3 say yes to surrender 1 says no 1 does not vote the result is 3 of 4 say surrender therefore approved. -Example 2 - 4 players in game two vote surrender 1 votes no 1 no vote, 2 out of 3 is result therefore game ends.
Counter Argument --> "I played a lot of games people wanted to give up on but we came back!" true this could be said for any game, someone else could DC a team might make mistakes etc, but seeing as on average players will be loosing 50% of all games if a majority of player do not want to continue and want to start a new game i think it should be allowed.
Thanks for your consideration please let me know if anyone else feels this way.