FF voting

shroomingyou··3 votes·1,494 views

Is it just me or does anyone else think it's ridiculous that when you have a troll on the team and they are feeding hard early game that not only do you have to wait 15 minutes in a toxic game but at that point if the troll won't vote yes and the majority votes yes it still won't go through? I'm sorry but isn't this supposed to be a user friendly team game? Is there any word at all on if this system is going to be fixed or changed? 4 out of 5 not wanting to play with someone toxic or trolling is a lot. Having to wait 15 minutes to stop a game is a bit over the top and the only other way to end it is to have someone go afk but then they can get a report and penalty. That is so wrong. League is forcing you to play in toxic games that ruin the experience for everyone else while penalizing you for simply removing yourself from a bad situation. In my opinion this is toxic in itself. What if a friend gets on and our team would rather play with him? Can't until late game. All because it wasn't "unanimous". That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. We're team based but don't care what the team wants. Oh. Ok. I guess we'll just deal with a toxic player and then let another team get more fed and get unrealistic stats because of one kid feeding. Did they earn those kills? nope. They did however use no abilities to kill a troll standing in lane and cussing out the team. Did we get to leave? Nope. We have to stay for fear of a penalty. Can we vote to ff? Nope because 1 troll is voting no regardless of the rest of the team wants. Even if you were just 1 person wanting to leave. I would rather you leave and we have fun then you stay and feed more. This might just be me but it seems wrong and toxic.

5 Comments

JustaNewb2 votes

Previously it was 10, and it was increased to 20 for awhile to keep people from giving up before even laning had ended.

JglrWarwick1 votes

Yeah, this has been mentioned many times before, and it's a contributing factor which makes how one player can lose the entire game for you, but one good player cannot carry the entire team, if four people vote no, and one single person votes yes, who is feeding/being toxic, then they obviously don't want people to have fun anyway.

ModWulf Helhammer1 votes

This is for an early surrender. This is ending a game much earlier then it should be, so it requires the full team's agreement that they want it to end.

If there's one person that is trolling the game, then wait the additional 5 minutes to get a normal surrender vote.

shroomingyou1 votes

The issue is that if someone is intentionally feeding and its happening early game regardless of time, if the whole team minus the feeder is voting yes then the majority should rule. The system is literally set up to be a troll paradise and then the staff claims to want to deter that type of behavior. It's sad. It is such a simple fix but instead they choose not to and they make it to where one salty person can ruin the experience for everyone

ModWulf Helhammer1 votes

If one person is going to vote no on an early surrender, then wait 5 minutes and use the normal vote.

More from Gameplay