I've been playing Pantheon top for a while, and although I do fairly good in the laning phase, I just can't do good after that phase. (the time where most people say Pantheon falls off) So, I tried jungling as Pantheon, and it has been amazing. I feel like I just have more of an influence on the team than I did in the top lane. I just want to know why people say jungle Pantheon isn't very good.
Craft Zeppelin2 votesThe most largest problem you have as jungle pantheon, is that you dont have a laner standing in front of you that you can torment 24 hours.
shadowlord7232 votesPersonally I believe Pantheon jungle is viable. I don't see why not. I've seen it half the times I see Pantheon players. He's got fine ganking potential with a lock on CC which can follow with good damage. Even without that gap closer, he still has a base movement speed of 355, which is one of the highest in game. His passive allows him to stay in the jungle longer. His ult...well...I don't need to explain that. Like 
or 
, he is good for early game ganks.
Even 
and 
are viable junglers. But they both have one gap closer and unlike Pantheon, they lack hard CC.
Not to mention, if you say that you are better at Pantheon jungle rather than Pantheon top, then keep doing jungle! Don't let anyone else stop you!
ItsWorth1T2 votesThank you for that advice!
MirirLightHammer1 voteshi, i tried pantheon jungle but failed miserably, any suggestions? XD i think my build was wrong i went with 
but i couldn't make anything past bloodrazor and tiamat+vampiric scepter. i consider myself a junler main and was able to junle with karthus but panth...i don't know...
Jefftiffy1 votesPantheon doesn't jungle anymore because his clears are slow and his ganks are fairly projected. Sure they are strong when they land, but if you don't get good ones early the games probably over because you start to fall near mid game.