Skip to content

"elo hell isn't real"

DominusLT··3 votes·2,152 views

just had a game where our vayne was 0-7-0 and sona was 0-4-0 after 20 minutes.

sounds normal, right? happens every game

but the thing is that the enemy ADC was dc'd at level 2

so their pyke support got every single one of those kills by himself.

now these 2 players on bot side were silver 1 and bronze 1. the pyke was silver 3.

we won that game, and as such both players had their MMR increased.

i've had 6 leavers by 5 minutes into the game either through dc or ragequit without getting a single leaver from the opposing team until now.

imagine matching with these players, while having a disproportionate amount of leavers on your team.

if elo hell doesn't exist then i don't know what does

20 Comments

Cocho2 votes

i get those games in diamond.

you saying you get more griefers on your team is just bad luck and low sample size. Over 1000 games, it'll even out.

EVERYONE CANT GET MORE GRIEFERS ON THEIR TEAM THAN THE ENEMY, THAT DOESNT MAKE SENSE LOL.

I litterally see games you weren't 3/9 , 0/5, 1/5, 2/9

Here's even a game where you got carried.

https://gyazo.com/7837ad97c6dac01455ee0097cb92f559?token=4a007847cbfadaaa53d50637e0cf346f

Is your argument really that, riot 'targets' you by placing humans on your team that have bad games just like you? Your average KDA in the past 20 games is 6/6/6. You actually have a 55% winrate over those games, while averaging 38% kill participation. You don't help your team at all and you dont do well yourself. You're currently silver 1 and the highest you've been is silver 1. A mental block is probably the reason you arent climbing but other than that I think you're right where you should be. You really think you deserve to climb?

DominusLT1 votes

{quoted}

i get those games in diamond.

you saying you get more griefers on your team is just bad luck and low sample size. Over 1000 games, it'll even out.

EVERYONE CANT GET MORE GRIEFERS ON THEIR TEAM THAN THE ENEMY, THAT DOESNT MAKE SENSE LOL.

I litterally see games you weren't 3/9 , 0/5, 1/5, 2/9

Here's even a game where you got carried.

https://gyazo.com/7837ad97c6dac01455ee0097cb92f559?token=4a007847cbfadaaa53d50637e0cf346f

Is your argument really that, riot 'targets' you by placing humans on your team that have bad games just like you? Your average KDA in the past 20 games is 6/6/6. You actually have a 55% winrate over those games, while averaging 38% kill participation. You don't help your team at all and you dont do well yourself. You're currently silver 1 and the highest you've been is silver 1. A mental block is probably the reason you arent climbing but other than that I think you're right where you should be. You really think you deserve to climb?

I never complained about my own games holding me down. I used them to support the idea of elo hell's existence. I have enough time to rank up if I grind the game, but the idea that elo hell doesn't exist is absurd. How could a player without consistently high playtime rank up without having to play several ranks above where they should be at?

Since you went out of your way to provide some of my scores for literally no reason, I'd like to use those to further my point that someone else without time would be completely fucked in this system.

The 1/5/0 game you mention I was autofilled into mid while playing with my other silver friend. Every other player on our team was gold. They all played worse than us by a wide margin, and they literally gave my laner an extra 300 gold before the lane even started. The game was over before I even had 2 deaths, so assuming someone went 5/0/0 in a lane within 15 minutes, which would require a mix of skill way above the rank you're at and a garbage opponent, you would still lose.

As for low sample size, you're both wrong and missing the point. The long string of games you have to play to even it out is quite frankly impossible for most people, and regardless it's statistically improbable that it'll even out for at least 35% of players.

THE HAPPY PUPPY1 votes

You're assuming you can be a better player than your rank indicates?

If you've played 10 games in 6 months, maybe.... But If your real skill is gold 4 and you play 100 games and can't get to gold 4. Then you are doing something that is holding you back. It might be your champion choice, does not work with your teams, maybe your play style doesn't mix well with the champions you pick, maybe you make a few too many mistakes each game which cause you to lose games that you would have won, minus even just 1 fatal error. When I play with my really low skill friend, he makes about 2 mistakes per minute on average that decrease his chances of winning by quite a bit. He doesn't even know he's making those mistakes until I point them out. The ignorance of everyone including myself is boundless. The only thing we know for sure is that it's humanly possible to win 90 percent of your games up to at least plat if you're good enough. Which means if you can't climb, you gotta get better and make less fatal mistakes, and take more successful risks.

Elo hell doesn't exist unless you define it in such a way that the concept is meaningless. if elo hell isn't the elo which you can't climb because of horrid teams and trolls, then the concept is nothing more than a trick of language to take the blame off yourself and place it on the ranked system, or the teams you get. If elo hell as I defined it does exist, then it would be a legitimate complaint one could make. But that is not the case, because it's empirically proven that if you're good enough you can win most of your games.

I never complained about my own games holding me down. I used them to support the idea of elo hell's existence. I have enough time to rank up if I grind the game, but the idea that elo hell doesn't exist is absurd."

I'm looking at your op.gg right now. I'll list off a few things I notice right off the bat.

  1. You die too much (over 5 per game on every champ you play), if you're dying more than 4 times per game average, without getting wins from the extra deaths, then you're just feeding and reducing your chances of winning. Yes, it is true that you can use your deaths to win games, but that's an art all in it's own and requires that your team is on the ball, and use your sacrifice well. That's 2 conditions, You make a good sacrifice, and your team uses it well. I tend to make really good sacrifices myself and tend to hold around 3 - 5 deaths average all the way up to plat, But only 1 death per game on average of mine is a sacrifice, some games its 2 some 0, but on average i might die once per game in a sacrificial manner to win the game or a baron or something to increase win chance. All deaths after 1 per game, are my mistake and my incompetence. But one shouldn't be winning games by sacrificing themselves constantly throughout the game for small rewards. I'll die for a baron, or an inhib, or a wipe into nexus kill.

  2. Very low kills/assists, it's one thing to have low kills on garen and cho, but your assists are also very very low. Which means you're not only failing to get kills yourself but you're not feeding any of your carries. On your taliyah, you die wayy too much on a champ that's not supposed to be dying in team fights. You're supposed to be staying alive to the end, dealing dps and dropping ur cc.

  3. You're at %50 win loss, you're exactly where you belong, if you wanna have gold, then you have to figure out what you're doing wrong that's holding you back. It might be your mentality, might be your concentration, might be your mechanics, your macro, but it's prob all of the above. Imo, for you to get gold, improving on even just 1 of the above will be enough to get you into gold. I'd suggest; however working on your mentality and your concentration. You do well enough to get gold, but you're just falling short barely. You're literally so close, don't blame elo hell, and don't assume you need to hard grind to get more wins. You just need to play a little bit better for gold, and a lot better for plat of course.

I get the jist that you're justifying your belief that elo hell exists, by the idea that it takes forever to climb, that you need to "grind out games". That's not true, it takes forever for some people to get better, because of mental blockers. Beliefs that hold you back, complexes and the sort. As well as your attitude as a whole. If you're good at the game, you will climb pretty fast, if you're not good at the game, then you have to get good, at getting good at stuff. So you can get good, faster, then climb faster. How do you do such a thing?

  1. Change your belief systems, believe that you can become highly skilled quickly, believe you can win most of your games, believe that losses are almost always due to your own mistakes. Beliefs matter a lot, don't know how to change your belief systems? Try learning some philosophical methods of critical thought, read up on some psychology and figure it out. Greatness isn't easy, and honestly, if you did all of this, not only will your rank improve, but everything you do in your life will be of a higher quality too. It's worth the investment of effort and time to master your own mind, and be humble while doing it.

  2. Watch your replays, play a game or 2 then go though the replay, and look at every death you had, and every fight you could have made a better impact on, and take mental note of what you did wrong, and could have done better. If you play 2 games and watch both replays that should take no longer than 80 to 100 minutes in total playing and watching 2 games. By doing this you will improve faster than if you played 5 - 10 - 15 games every session and didn't look at any replays and did no introspection. This is a method of getting better, faster.

  3. Watch good players, and pay attention to what they do in the game, don't worry a lot about what they say, can mute them if you want. Just watch what they do, and ask yourself why they do it.

  4. Change your goal from wanting whatever rank, and to wanting whatever competency. You need to value skill, not rank. You may think you value skill, but I'm pretty much certain you don't in reality. Might be a lie you unknowingly tell yourself. But from your post here, it's clear that your unconscious values revolve around the rank you achieve and not the skill level you achieve. Fix that, value the process, value the skill and the rank will come.

Elo hell only exists in your subjective, personal experience. It's not an objective reality, your beliefs create elo hell for you and you get stuck in it. Master your mind, or ignore everything i said, and stay the same, average normie forever.

This is a competitive game, it's not a single player game where you progress even if ur not that good at it. ur against other Humans who all wanna win. welcome to competitive gaming, you can either step up or be a wet dripping beta who blames elo hell. It's true most people wont climb, but that's not a flaw in league, it's a flaw of the humans. You say you can't climb without being a lot better than where you're playing? Yeah, that's the whole damn point. You're not supposed to be able to climb fast or at all unless you're better than your current rank. The better you are, the faster you climb. For some people getting better, takes forever, for the reasons I stated above. Some people get good, pretty fast. Wanna get good fast, so you can climb fast? Put in the work & training to get the skill.

Cocho1 votes

I never complained about my own games holding me down.

just had a game where our vayne was 0-7-0 and sona was 0-4-0 after 20 minutes. sounds normal, right? happens every game.

What about when you are that 0/7 player? You just ignore that, and blame your team. Here.

Since you went out of your way to provide some of my scores for literally no reason, I'd like to use those to further my point that someone else without time would be completely fucked in this system. The 1/5/0 game you mention I was autofilled into mid while playing with my other silver friend. Every other player on our team was gold. They all played worse than us by a wide margin, and they literally gave my laner an extra 300 gold before the lane even started. The game was over before I even had 2 deaths, so assuming someone went 5/0/0 in a lane within 15 minutes, which would require a mix of skill way above the rank you're at and a garbage opponent, you would still lose.

Autofilled? Are you not confident? Dodge. You were the weaker mid, you dont know how to play mid. You lost lane and your team couldnt bring you back up. Thats your fault.

I gave you multiple examples where your scoreline looks awfully low. And you pick the one game where your laner got a kill in the invade. You're unironically blaming your team, after saying you dont blame your team. Were you watching for invades or were you in fountain?

Either way, its still a silver akali player. A plat player would beat her anyways.

The problem isnt this 1/5, its a lot of 1/5 games. You wouldnt consistently do bad, if you were better than that elo. Your team doing bad, doesnt make you die 2x more than everyone else in the game.

I used them to support the idea of elo hell's existence. I have enough time to rank up if I grind the game, but the idea that elo hell doesn't exist is absurd. How could a player without consistently high playtime rank up without having to play several ranks above where they should be at?

You've played more games than me and you're still stuck. I went from g4 to d4 in less games than you. 200 games is a lot. Recently being trolled in your last 10 or so games, isnt a large sample size. You dont have to be diamond to beat silver players.

As for low sample size, you're both wrong and missing the point. The long string of games you have to play to even it out is quite frankly impossible for most people, and regardless it's statistically improbable that it'll even out for at least 35% of players.

35% is a number you pulled out of your ass. One team losses because of a troll, and one wins. It evens out at 50% over a large number of games, like 200 games.

You have a game, where you got carried. If you were on the enemy team, you woudlve thought they were trolling you. But you dont think they are a troll because they arent on your team.

You are the most mediocre player ive ever seen. Your stats scream 50% and even all across the board. The fact that you don't see how you've lost your team many games is hilarious.

You dont play better than your laner consistently (silver opponents) You don't help your team but your laner might help them (0 impact vs some impact) You die a lot (Like a lot.)

You arent going to climb until you realize you have a lot of things you can improve. The audacity to blame your team when you're averaging 6/8 on taliyah and still silver on garen after 3 years is disgusting. Who do you think you even are?

I climbed from lower. And I was truly a b5 player when i hit level 30. You dont need to be much better when you are playing 200 games.

I could make a post and say, I had a jg taliyah...

she went 1/13

i saw that she went top taliyah for some reason.

she went 3/14

OMG ELO HELL.

thats actually just your teammate's idea of you. You arent the star player of your solo queue games to say the least, stop playing for LP and start playing to improve.

THE HAPPY PUPPY1 votes

ELo hell doesn't exist, Look at my op.gg https://na.op.gg/summoner/champions/userName=Fk%20Em%20Bums I'm not diamond, at best i'll make it to plat. I don't duo with good players, I duo with an iron 2 level player who usually does really bad, yet I still manage to carry most games.

If you know what you're doing you can carry though iron bronze and silver with afks and trolls. You don't even need to be diamond+ to do so, as I am now I'm prob plat 4 or gold 1 level and I have no problem carrying hard af outta so called "elo hell". Tbh, I call it "elo heaven" cuz it's so easy to just curb stomp kids who believe they're in elo hell.

Hope this helps your attitude so you can no longer be blocked by limited beliefs!

1 Inch and Proud4 votes

elo hell doesnt exist because you smurf?? youre the reason elo hell also exists. because you just said youre smurfing with an iron 2.

THE HAPPY PUPPY1 votes

Dude.......... Wow, Dunning Kruger much?

What in the actual fuck, do you think elo hell means? I'm under the impression, the reason people complain about elo hell, is because they believe it's humanly impossible to win a lot of games, and climb out of said elo because of bad teams and afks/trolls.

I'm saying elo hell doesn't exist, cuz I've NEVVVVVVER had any problem climbing out of the bottom ranks, in-fact the lower the rank the easier it is to win... What people call "elo hell" is actually "elo heaven" but they get hit with dunning Kruger and can't see that their failure to climb, isn't because their elo is too hard, it's because they suck really bad and don't even understand how bad they suck, so instead of blaming their own lack of skill and competence, they blame the elo and the teams they're in.

It's humiliatingly pathetic that people can be so deluded as you, and as deluded as people who think they're in elo hell because they can't climb due to any of the above reasons.

The saddest thing about this is, I bet you lack the cognitive capacity to even comprehend what i've said here.

Nerull1 votes

No its the fact that you will carry your iron 2 to silver 1 then we will get them in a game and they will feed making our game statistically lopsided. its not that hard of concept. its the fact you have to play 500-1000 games to get out sometimes because the stats dont matter in matchmaking at mid to high silver low gold

THE HAPPY PUPPY1 votes

Your strawmans are very telling of your psychological state.

No its the fact that you will carry your iron 2 to silver 1 then we will get them in a game and they will feed making our game statistically lopsided.

  1. First off no, he won't be getting to silver unless he gets good enough to belong there. He's currently bronze 4, when we started he was iron 4. only 2 weeks ago he was a iron 2 level player in iron 4. Now he's a bronze 4 level player, in bronze 4. I've not boosted his rank, i've boosted his skill. I spend every game going over his decisions and explaining the game to him. this is because I value skill, not rank. Anyone who receives any kind of coaching from me be it in life or in a game, first learn that perspective. Secondly, I am not good enough to carry him past silver 3 even if I wanted to. But again, my goal and his goal isn't to get higher ranked, it's to get higher skilled, then the rank will come.

  2. "no its the fact that" what the hell are you talking about here? What are you even saying no to? Are you saying no, to my claim that elo hell doesn't exist? Or are you saying no to my claim that because I and many others i know can climb fast in what people call "elo hell" that elo hell is a figment of people's imagination, drummed up to compensate for their ego? Either way, you've made no argument that discredits any of my claims.

Claim 1. Elo hell is a figment of people's imagination for the purpose of relieving ego pain. It doesn't exist in reality.
Claim 2. since I and many I know can climb though what people call elo hell, with ease, claim 1 is true.

its the fact you have to play 500-1000 games to get out sometimes because the stats dont matter in matchmaking at mid to high silver low gold

The problem is not that you need 500 - 1000 games to get out. It's that it takes 500 - 1000 games for some people to get good enough to climb out. You're missing the concept entirely, hence why I invoked dunning Kruger on you. You're not even aware of how ignorant you are. It never took me 500 - 1000 games to get plat any season, at my worst it took me 200 games to get plat from silver 1 or gold 5. At my best i've gotten plat in less than 30 games. It's based on how well I play, not how many games I play. The only reason it takes SOME people many games to climb, is because they were not good enough to climb fast. They play 500 - 1000 games, and in that process they get better, and climb. You're missing the fact that the number of games needed to get higher rank, is because of how hard it is for some kinds of people to learn and improve quickly.

In another post on this thread i detail out some methods of improving your skills fast, and with fewer games.

Lastly I will say that just because some people DO get boosted to higher rank then they deserve, doesn't mean you're off the hook for not winning a game, where you get a boosted kid on your team. I've been in 1000s of games, with boosted people on my team, and still won. At the end of the day, in league, or anything in life. If you wanna achieve high goals, then you need to put in the work, training and take 100 percent ownership of what happens. Otherwise, ur just playing mental games with yourself, to ease the pain your ego causes you when you don't achieve the reward you want.

Nerull1 votes

please uninstall and stop boosting your friend. Its just plain trolling for you to state clearly that you carry your iron friend while duoing when you are "plat" then in the same damn breath say that hes only climbing because he is getting better not the fact that you literally just said you carry him.

Second its pretty well documented and I would almost guarantee that riot could release win statistics of people who climb from silver to see the halt that happens in high silver do to the fact that they force everyone to play there despite skill and that every single "4" tier is a shit fest because riot doesn't let people fall below a "4" tier unless they are drastically lower on MMR than that tier and lost 4 or 5 games in a row while at 0lp letting boosted people sit at it for an eternity since they get carried 1/5 games by accident.

By the way stating that "someone on my team was boosted and we won" does not account for actual statistics of what happens in silver do to the fact that mass amounts of people are boosted to gold 4, carried to gold 4 ect and the matchmaking system takes forever to detect that there MMR is wrong.

Nerull1 votes

Oh but if we are doing anecdotal then my factual proof is it took me over 100 games to get out of silver 1 but only 30 to get from gold 3 to gold 1. Therefore silver 1 is harder even though its lower MMR.

THE HAPPY PUPPY1 votes

In that 100 games to get out of silver, you got good enough to climb to gold 1. It was faster to get to gold 1, because in those 100 games of silver you got to a gold 1 level. You unlocked w/e was blocking you from gold, and climbed from there. Now I bet you'll be stuck gold 1 or plat 4 for a while. Then maybe you'll improve, and break though the pattern of play that holds you back from diamond.

as I just said in my last reply, you're looking at data with poor reasoning, and poor belief systems.

THE HAPPY PUPPY1 votes

I can see you're just a sophist, and prefer to live in a delusion that protects your ego. You've not addressed any of my arguments, you straw man and sidestep everything. You do not argue in good faith. I will make 1 more set of arguments in hopes that you will improve your mental, but I don't care enough about the quality of your thinking to put anymore effort into teaching you.

I don't "carry" my friend, I coach him. As I said, and you didn't even address any of my points. You just make a claim talking right over me and ignoring all of my logic and 90% of the picture. You literally just hard straw man me in order to reinforce your delusional ego protecting belief. My friend has gotten observably better, and he is currently bronze 4 and plays at a bronze 4 level. If I was "boosting him" he would be silver by now. Your straw mans are so disgusting and manipulative that i can't help but notice how toxic your mind must be.

I will spell this out very simple and short.

  1. If I was boosting he'd already be silver and well above his skill level.
  2. Since I am coaching him, he's improved and his rank has improved as well.
  3. He has not achieved a rank with me that's so far beyond his skill that he's a net negative for those in his games.
  4. Some people do boost, and some people are boosted, but that's not what I do, i coach people and have no interest in getting people a rank they don't deserve.

You can't sit there and straw man me without it being obvious, to me and everyone else reading. You also can't sit there and claim that my intentions are anything other than what I've clearly stated.

The reason there might be a halt in high silver, isn't because of elo hell. it's because the average player is average.... Literally, in a game like this you're gonna have a few places where people accumulate. Not because of some flaw in the system, but because inorder to get past that specific elo, you need to be good enough. Most people don't put in the time, and effort to get better than an average silver or gold skill level.

  1. Most people don't put in the time and effort to improve past the brick wall ranks like silver 1 and gold 4. If they put in the effort they'd get better and climb out. It's totally doable.
  2. Many people are just not competent people in general, they suck at almost EVERYTHING they do, game or not and they get average stuck in an average place cuz as a person they're just a average normie pleb.
  3. Mental blockers, personality flaws and poor focus/concentration hold people back, they will pool up in average ranks.

You're totally misinterpreting the data you're assuming exists, because the lens by which you look at it, is flawed. Your belief system is deluded and flawed, and because of that you don't see things clearly.

With that, i'm done here. Hopefully you learn something from my lectures, if not then w/e, have fun. Drops mic.

Nerull1 votes

second group of points supports mine since you say people get to a "4" tier then stop trying meaning that they reached an MMR then their skill level dropped because they stopped trying meaning when when they are placed on a team that team is at a disadvantage since there is a player who is playing worse than there assumed MMR since they are not trying.

I agree most people are not competent. The problem is that they are placed in silver 3 and assigned to games that have silver 1s even though they are actually silver 4 or worse.

I agree mental blocks raging quitting ect that people do does cause them to lose games they should win. But all I am saying is if you created a perfect MMR robot and placed one in each tier. Silver would have the least 50% win rate at 10 games 50 games and 100 games taking the longest to reach 50% compared to a perfect Plat 2 MMR bot. Again its not a brick wall is a torrential flow of sludge pushing you back and forth meaning that if you aren't drastically better it takes forever to get out.

First point of the first group Sounds good. Ill go hire a pro player to play in my games and "coach" me. And me winning games while having a pro player on my team increasing my MMR wont actually artificially increase my MMR. Glad to hear it. Again you said you carried the games so don't give me this coaching crap either you are in the game with him smurfing or you are not. go "coach" in normals.

Nerull1 votes

Seems like just about every diamond who smurfs agree the random group in mid to high silver and low gold is harder to win/carry than diamond games.

THE HAPPY PUPPY1 votes

They say that because of a bias and misconception. I've seen plenty of diamond and up players make this claim. But when I look at the empirical data, their claim doesn't hold up.

I was watching a zed player, playing in gold and he kept complaining that gold is harder than diamond. But when you look at the data, his diamond games were at 55% win rates on his champs, while his gold games were at a 90 percent win rate. So clearly, his words didn't match the reality. I've seen this exact same fallacy over and over countless times with my high ranked friends and streamers.

The reason for this fallacy is, the smurf will feel like the game should be way easier than it is, when he's playing in gold. But He ends up surprised at how hard he has to carry some games. He's under a bit of a false premise that it should be effortless for him to just win gold games. When it's not true at all, gold players are not as bad as people try to make them out to be. Yeah they suck, but they will still put up a hell of a fight even if you're diamond. Also, you'll get someone with a weak mental on ur team and they might become very heavy. This happens in every elo. But the fallacy is still just a fallacy, the games in gold for these smurfs are still easier to win than their diamond games despite what they say. I've never seen a truly skilled diamond player, lose more in gold then they do in diamond. Never seen that in the almost 10 years of playing.

People say shit that's stupid and poorly thought though often. It's emotional, a diamond with %55 percent win rate or w/e who plays in gold and gets 70 - 90% win rate yet says it's harder to carry and win in gold is literally just puking emotional anti-rationality out his mouth.

Nerull1 votes

Ahh thanks for clearing it up. They are stupid and you aren't. You are truly truly outrageous.

THE HAPPY PUPPY1 votes

Your straw mans are outrageous.

I'm saying they are blocked by psychological complexes, it's not intelligence. It's mental health. I'm just a fair bit more mentally healthy, and have learned critical thinking skills in such a way that allow me to see things a bit more clearly than most. With that said, I can improve on that, and there's people out there much better at clear rational thinking and analysis than I am.

Your strawmans won't work on me dude, I'm a diamond level thinker with humility who learns from challenger level thinkers.

Nerull1 votes

Nope its just that you state facts then provide anecdotal evidence and stick your nose up.

Nerull1 votes

https://www.leagueofgraphs.com/rankings/rank-distribution here are numbers. So it is NORMAL as a silver 1 to see Bronze 1 to Gold 3 in your game. That means within your games matchmaking is picking between 54% of ALL ranked players. The system assumes they are actually the MMR they currently are even though they were placed DEAD CENTER of this shit show amalgamation of Competition. To assume these games are similarly competitive to a gold 1 game where you will see matchmaking pick from 28% of players. Zero who were given a free pass and drastically less who were boosted unless you think people pay for boosting past gold 4/5 at the same rate they boost to plat 1. or that they are similarly competitive actual MMR/Skill(actual skill) wise in comparison to Leagues Assumed MMR(what they think you are) is literally insane. Like you would literally have to believe that when that new person does placements league puts them as close to their MMR as a person who has climbed/fallen for hundreds or thousands of games. No one says elo hell is unwinnable. people obviously climb out. They are saying that it creates Non-Competitive games at such a high rate that unless you are drastically above the MMR you are in it becomes a thousand game slog for the actual statistics to come into your favor.

More from Gameplay