Now that there are so many champs, we should ban 30 during draft.

Unicornography·Nov 14, 2016·1 votes·451 views

It's only fair that before a game each player gets to ban 2 champs. There are just too many champs and banning six isn't enough to make a difference in a single game, the likelihood that the opponents were going to pick one of the three that your team bans is just too low. If you ban 30 champs, then you'll most likely hit at least one that the other team was going to use. Otherwise, I think we should just get rid of banning altogether, but 6 just doesn't make a difference.

7 Comments

FourVsFiveNov 14, 20162 votes

People are simply asking for 1 ban for each player. No need for any more then that.

UnicornographyNov 14, 20161 votes

There is a great need for 30 bans, I don't think the game can survive much longer with only 6 bans.

MR KIMCHI SENPAINov 14, 20162 votes

2 x 10 =/= 30

what are you smoking

UnicornographyNov 14, 20161 votes

Sorry, I'm used to playing with three teams, I know that most people do only two teams. But, if it were 2 teams, we would need three bans per person. It's not bans per person I am concerned about, it is just that there be 30 bans.

VoidStaresBackNov 14, 20162 votes

...how are you even playing with three teams in this game, that's not even possible.

UnicornographyNov 14, 20161 votes

When you have three teams it's a death match to the end. Whose nexus will be the last one standing? THe only way to find out is to play until the end. If it's yours you win! If it's someone else's then you lose, because that means your nexus was destroyed.