He looks aesthetically AMAZING, but I don't like the "Execute" function in general. It's not healthy gameplay wise. (Darius)
I also don't like how he has obvious, exploitable flaws and strengths. I like champions that can be played on neutral ground and strategy alone. (Ori, Lee Sin, Karma.)
He seems like a "Rock Type Pokemon" , can be very niche and strong in one area and fall-flat in many others, so I don't think I'll be maining him.
I think the execute function is good because it forces the enemy to make a choice. Try to kill Urgot right away or just let that person die. If they are unable to Urgot gets the huge fear. Also Darius is a pretty healthy champion so I completely disagree with you lol. He doesn't even have an execute, it's just flat true damage. Execute damage is stuff that increases based on missing health so Jinx ult Garen ult, Lee Sin Q, Elise Q.
Yeah if this game was filled with a bunch of jack of all trade champions it'd be really boring. Balance wise the best jacks become meta and leads and are unfun to play against. I find it funny how you name Orianna and Lee Sin, champions that are pretty cancerous. I like Karma though, she has all these abilities that are jack of all trades but her ult allows her to instantly change that and full out focus on one thing (damage, sustain, shielding) a good champion.
He seems like he'll have a rough time starting laning phase. But will become a monster when the top laners starts trading.
The execute is the best part.
Given how often the client crashes, I always cringe when they make a robot character. Urgot should just malfunction and go offline randomly.
I also don't like how he has obvious, exploitable flaws and strengths. I like champions that can be played on neutral ground and strategy alone.
Well they all cant be generalists. Generalists are one of the more cancerous groups in the game. They have no bad match-ups, and can be played into a lot of situations regardless of team comps. 
are all generalists who for the most part (besides ori since she is an actually balanced champion for the most part) have been very overpowering until just recently. Please explain this "neutral ground" and "strategy" that defines them? If anything, they have the opposite. They are good into most situations, which is not being neutral, and can be played regardless of team comps and often be successful in doing so, which asks where is the strategy in that?
