Does Rank Need More Bans?
Just wanted to know if people had the same opinion as me. Does rank need more bans?
Just wanted to know if people had the same opinion as me. Does rank need more bans?
Yes it does, I dont like to compare Mobas typically, but Dota has less champions and has 5 bans for the draft mode....
Really? Damn I didn't know that. I am even more shocked now that league doesn't have more bans
5 bans for 110 (?) heroes
The bans also are staggered and some bans happen after one person has already picked, and a lot of heroes in Dota can be counterpicked into not being useful at all - Broodmother into Earthshaker or Skywrath Mage into Pugna for example, so those 5 bans are warranted because other heroes can just be countered
However counter picks in League are more like "I have a slightly easier time against this guy." We need more bans because its a lot harder to negate an op champs power with a counter, a TF being able to spot rengar in invisibility may be a slight counter, but a hero in Dota literally making someone instantly die If they use their abilities next to them is a gamebreaking counterpick
[{quoted}](name=Faceroll Tactics,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=hNIOGa07,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2016-05-14T23:34:47.703+0000)
5 bans for 110 (?) heroes
The bans also are staggered and some bans happen after one person has already picked, and a lot of heroes in Dota can be counterpicked into not being useful at all - Broodmother into Earthshaker or Skywrath Mage into Pugna for example, so those 5 bans are warranted because other heroes can just be countered
However counter picks in League are more like "I have a slightly easier time against this guy." We need more bans because its a lot harder to negate an op champs power with a counter, a TF being able to spot rengar in invisibility may be a slight counter, but a hero in Dota literally making someone instantly die If they use their abilities next to them is a gamebreaking counterpick
The point is that DotA 2 has five bans, never mind the process. The fact that League has the second largest roster in the market and yet has one of the smallest ban sizes is very telling on where the devs priorities lie, and it isn't in the community at large.
It needs the ability to have a "wild card" where both teams can agree to ban 2 extra champs or something.
Cause currently the 100% bans are

and then you get your up and coming bs

EDIT: Whoops looks like i forgot the worst of them all
code name Middle sticks.
Soraka isn't really a 100% ban anymore since her most recent balance nerfs. Below diamond, maybe, but diamond players are wise enough to take Ignite, purchase Morellos, Executioner/Mortal Reminder to actually shut Soraka down. I don't even see Taric banned too often in diamond either. Occasionally, I'll see the two banned, but not very often.
The general agreement on Poppy isn't that she's op or busted either. She's just extremely good in coordinated games, hence her always being picked in LCS and MSI. She's just an extremely useful asset in coordinated teams.
[deleted]
cough were not all diamond lmao
My point isn't that I'm diamond. My point is, diamond players are smart enough to take the steps to counter Soraka. It's not that hard of a concept, but players want the easy way and neglect to take Grievous Wounds so they cry op and ban her.
Literally no one builds 
[zombie-nunu-tears]
I did very often, whenever I'd go adc and was against a Mundo, Soraka, Nidalee, etc. @@ Now there's even more reason to against them.
I only get the idiot ADCs that think you should be building
against champions like Mundo and Vlad.
It doesn't matter how much more damage you deal to them, you're just letting them heal it all back! (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
[{quoted}](name=Frozen Sovereign,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=hNIOGa07,comment-id=00010001,timestamp=2016-05-14T17:21:26.681+0000)
Soraka isn't really a 100% ban anymore since her most recent balance nerfs. Below diamond, maybe, but diamond players are wise enough to take Ignite, purchase Morellos, Executioner/Mortal Reminder to actually shut Soraka down. I don't even see Taric banned too often in diamond either. Occasionally, I'll see the two banned, but not very often.
The general agreement on Poppy isn't that she's op or busted either. She's just extremely good in coordinated games, hence her always being picked in LCS and MSI. She's just an extremely useful asset in coordinated teams.
I don't get support bans in general. If an ADC in low ELO requests a Blitzcrank ban I try to give it to them if we can spare a ban because I know they're going to walk into all his pulls. Other than that, it's a waste.
Soraka definitely got nerfed hard with the grievous wounds revert, and now any mage that gets Morellos can effectively assassinate the out of position carry without worrying about Soraka. She's number 8 in win rate, just behind Taric. She's not even top 5 in pick rate anymore. I think she's still good, but ban worthy? No way. The Taric bans aren't worth it anymore either, where as last patch they were a must for most leagues. Alistar, Braum, Blitzcrank, Nami, and of course Janna are doing better.
I completely disagree with the guy's opinion on Zed too. That's a must ban in so many ranked games.
What is and isn't ban worthy varies across leagues, and with dynamic queue I don't think more bans would make as big of an impact as people are trying to make it out to be. Like you said, some of these champions are insanely good if they are on coordinated teams that communicate.
However the champion pool keeps getting bigger. If Riot is so cautious to allow more bans in then they can always just let each side ban 4 champions for one patch. If it doesn't work out they can always revert it.
Ekko Malz and Zed are my must bans. QoL bans are Blitz or Soraka if the enemy team already banned Malz.
It needs the ability to have a "wild card" where both teams can agree to ban 2 extra champs or something.
Cause currently the 100% bans are
![]()
![]()
![]()
and then you get your up and coming bs
![]()
![]()
![]()
EDIT: Whoops looks like i forgot the worst of them all
code name Middle sticks.
who bans taric? did i miss something?
everyone thinks taric is op because they dont how to either back off when he tries to ult or kill the adc before his slow ult takes effect
Im sorry, leme walk away from a taric when he binds his stun to the front line tank that has an engage on us. Then tower dives us with his ultimate...................................
his stun is so fuckin telegraphed how do you even get hit by it besides being slowed by something before hand?
Or, you know, the Taric could just not be a dumbass and land it like every other skillshot.
i could say the same for all skill shots the fact that its harder to land means of course its going to do something you all act like taric just insta wins a game not only are people still getting hit by CC its so telegraphed people will be able to think of the right action to do.if you are in a position where taric can dive that means some where along the way you messed up and gave kills.if not then its easy to run since he has no hard CC out of a hard to hit skill shot stun with a rather thin hit box
Have you actually played Taric? The only time someone can "just dodge it" is with actual mobility, and even then you can outsmart them more than half the time.
Trust me, I have a 70% win-rate with him in a meta where Lucian, Ezreal, and Vayne are king. It doesn't matter how good they are, missing the skillshot is more often than not your own fault, not because they dodged it.
yes i have thus why im shocked that anymore has problems dodging his easy to miss stun and how people dont take advantage of the highly telegraphed ult since my adc just gets melted unless i can see into the future and cast my ult at the right time.Its almost impossible to use the ult defensively vs most bursty comps Offensively is the only real option which takes highly organized teams to cap on against poke comps they can just keep their distance from him when he ults.
Fyi, I just up voted both of your posts. Taric is op to noobs, same deal as Blitz. Both characters are reliant on a specific skill, or are extremely predictable. His ult? You told almost 3 seconds in advance(In a LoL Match, That's a lot) That he's doing it. not only that, There still affected by CC. And his Heal is pathetic. His W/E combo is his only threat.
Now that's straightened out, Why do/did people even ban Soraka? I mean, yes she's annoying but a frequent ban? I got into an argument in queue about this once. The only champs who deserve an infinite ban are Ekko and Malz. Maybe Zed.
im still not certain how taric was a must ban i mean maybe the ult but again it takes too long and his passive damage only works if he can auto attack which can be hard against comps with CC
His W/E combo is his greatest, and only noteworthy, asset. People ban him because they do these things off of numbers, not experience. And those who did it off experience, fed him on there first match and are convinced he's broken.
"where both teams can agree to ban 2 extra champs or something." Am I the only one here who extremely hates the idea of working with the enemy team in anything...?
Probably... Lol
Taric and Soraka aren't 100% bans.
honestly, 4 bans each team, is enough.
OR.
One ban, per player. = 10 bans.
Prefer 1 ban per player, but I would settle for 4 bans per team.
If it becomes one per then me and a lot of people with never play with or against X champion ever again.
For me it would be Ekko because I'm tired of not blinking
I have never understood the "pro scene" problem. People say, that this would help teams to negate a player with 5 target bans on his champion pool, but let's be realistic. Who would dare to call himself a "pro player" if he has 4 or 5 champions in his pool. A ban per player sounds pretty reasonable for me, that would enable strategy in ban phase, instead of "chose which 6 of the 10 OP champs this patch to ban"
One ban per person.
Ranked does need more bans but adding that is not going to make Riot money so it won't happen. If we had 10 bans their shiny new or recently buffed broken, unfun to play against champs would see less sales because of being always banned.
They also don't want to "increase queue times" despite how literally everyone would appreciate it and they could just lower the ban phase time to 20 secs per.
league needs a ban per person. period. 10 bans is only 7% of the entire possible champ pool. i mean god forbid you have to be good at more than 1 champion in ranked.
Its like I said in another thread... 10 bans per team...and another 10 wild card bans.
30 total bans. Gonna see a lot of dodges at that point, and that's why I've been pushing people to agree with me about dodging = 24 hour match ban and repeated offenses mean a much more severe punishment.
[slayer-jinx-unamused]
maybe like 8 instead of 6
No. 30. and if you dodge, you're in for a world of hurt while dealing with withdraws... ROFL
https://66.media.tumblr.com/0f25e00682c2ba34e560ff4164ee2e3d/tumblr_nu24udOTfS1qgm5xfo1_500.gif
lmao thats just
youd never play any of your champs people would be like
"Why not throw in a
ban in there"
Thanks for all the support everyone :D Glad to see people agree with some of what I have to say <3
Rank doesnt need more bans.
League needs more balance.
There are currently the SAME champions being banned over and over. Balance them please Riot.
Ranked needs more bans AND League DESPERATELY needs more balance.
Why not go at the problem from both angles for more effect?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5T9rgMZulM
A video about hard counters.
i dk


Why does Riot not allow everyone to ban? The reasoning is they need 16 champion to play draft/ranked. 6 bans+ 9 picks(except you)= 15 champs So there will always be one champ you can pick. But why don't they give everyone a ban. Then champion required will be 19. So new player will take some time to reach that number. But that's good as they will learn how to play the game and not rush ranked and get into elo-hell.
You're about right on everything here. Except Elo hell, as it doesn't actually exist. I've been there. If you're stuck in bronze, it's likely where you actually belong. Sorry to tell you :/
You're about right on everything here. Except Elo hell, as it doesn't actually exist. I've been there. If you're stuck in bronze, it's likely where you actually belong. Sorry to tell you :/
Or maybe you're just stuck with people who don't play well in teams. I was among the top fifty players in NA in a short-lived MOBA, but it took me over half the season to escape from Bronze into Silver here (the two tiers are actually not that different, if at all). It's because of two things: 1) the champions aren't balanced very well, and 2) many people in this dumb community aren't team players.
Yes..we need more bans.. there are simply to much OP champs (or combinations of)
always playing against
,
,
or
..assassins.
Or vs
,
,
,
and
top is so annoying.
Not even under towers you are safe from them..
You can't ban them al out..but it would be nice if everyone had a ban.. everyone has that champ they can't handle wel.
and it's different for everyone..
How many times have I banned
to see the que being dodged by a one trick pony.
This would force more diversity. and that's a good thing
Why do pro players even get 5 bans per team?