Anyone else think the way surrender work is a poor joke of a voting system?

Pretty sure this falls under gameplay so... So I rarely surrender or vote to surrender if the game really does look salvageable, but there are those times where its really not worth dragging out a obvious loss. yet when the vote for surrender comes up and 3 out of five ( majority) say yes and that one guy says no while the last guy doesn't vote at all (real game example btw) it will fail

I really thing the system is a joke. why is voting even there if the vote will fail when the majority wants to surrender and that one guy doesn't vote? Just saying but a really vote system, and yes there are many games with it and it actually works. have a majority rule.

this is how it should be

3 for, 2 against equals surrender, 3 for , 1 no, 1 non-vote is a surrender. vise versa if its 2 for, 3 against. the majority (3/5) should always win the vote. I really think it needs to be set up for that, I've seen vote systems in other game and it works like that, so why should this be different and have 3 people get frustrated at others. cause i mean when it gets down to it. if three people vote to surrender , they are already in that mindset of "this is over , I'm done" and arn't going to play there best, so it really just hinders the two who still want to keep going cause then they don't get a 100% effort out of the other player.

whats everyone else's thoughts on this? also do you think the voting system should be changed to a true majority ( 3 of 5 always wins)