Do something to the champion Akali

{quoted}

Now those are some crazy terms I'm hearing for the first time. Mind explaining what "Quantitative amalgamation" is supposed to be and how it increases a champ's win% by almost 20%?

It's a complex matter, but I'll try.

Quantitative amalgamation is the factoring of constituent values within a given sample of data, weighed against predicated quantity or an established proximal criterion, to determine what is called res practicus, or more colloquially, the "consummate value" of a figure derived from a given quantity of data. In the case of League win rates, one must factor the following when solving the amalgamation:

• Prevalence delta (Or, "How frequently is the champion played within a given snapshot of the community?" A higher prevalence delta will drive res practicus down, and vice versa.)
• Actuation factor (Or, "How aggressively does the established standard build affect a given player's build?" A larger actuation factor equates to a more pronounced influence from prevalence delta.)
• Prime ordinal (Or, "How often does the most effective Akali build win games?" Prime ordinal is used as a multiplier, representing Akali's objective "quality", as best it can be quantified.)
• Kinrose coefficient (Or, "How do proximate but non-contributing factors - AKA, other champions played and built similarly to Akali - affect the sample size for the above factors?" Plainly speaking, higher overall win rates among champions and builds falling within the Kinrose coefficient will mean a higher res practicus, while lower win rates will mean a lower res practicus. In short, "To what degree is all the rest of the calculation added to the on-paper win rate?")

In the end, the quantitative amalgamation for Akali's win rate calculates at 20.15%, raising her effective win rate - the consummate value of her win rate - at 63.24%. This is based on her win rate according to Champion.gg, I couldn't say how accurate that is. It's a ballpark figure, though, in any case.