WHY DO YOU HATE MELE ATTACK SPEED CHAMPS?!

muhandas razil··2 votes·772 views
Patch 6.1 notes

why on earth you you nerf trundle and then buff teemo??. its like you only want champs that fly around the map doing a billion damage to succeed. buffing riven. zed still can pop 2 people in a full spell rotation leblanc kills you before your game can update that something happened. leesin and shaco are counter jungling every single game without any repercussions like its just freelo and nope trundle is to strong. what about darius? renekton? are they to strong yet? where renekton can comfortably 2v1 if there jungler ganks and darius can 3v1 just because he is bored? RENEKTON EVEN HAS A DASH! trundle doesn't even have that going for him. if a vayne pushes one button his entire everything is just lost. can you please nerf some ad casters before you nerf some actual mele champions that take skill? when was the last time you were like "ah man if only i played that better i could have totally caught/ran away from that leesin/riven." that never happens then you see trundle on the enemy team right next to udyr and you are like "oh no he is walking at me slowly what am i ever going to do??" " maybe if i just use ANY AMOUNT OF CC he will just go away"

10 Comments

Crett3 votes

Trundle had a 56% win rate... although I share your sentiment, immobile champs need some more elbow room

muhandas razil1 votes

i under stand he has a 56% win rate. but whens the last time you saw a trundle montage? people breath live jack off to leesin insecs. (idk how to spell it) there is 50 times more lee sins in the n/a server than trundle players around the world pretty much. of course he has a high win rate. win 2/3 games thats a 66.6% win rate right there but win 25/50 lee sin games "lee needs a buff."

KMannnnn11 votes

The reason there aren't Trundle montages is because, as a low-mechanics, immobile champion, he doesn't offer as much hype as a hyper-mobile, high-mechanics champ like Lee.

But hype and montages are not the same as in-game power, and as a Trundle player, while I don't love him getting nerfed, I can agree that he's a bit on the strong side this patch.

Tilt Lorde1 votes

completely agree Riot has their heads up their asses, nerfing trundle over the champs that actually need nerfs.. removing q on towers, do it to nasus first then do it to trundle.. if only they made league fair or balanced..

muhandas razil1 votes

thank you

Maximum Morde1 votes

I'm pretty sure if they hated auto attack melee champions they never would have added devourer, or rageblade.

muhandas razil1 votes

but devourer is a smite thing. trundle top won't get that only yi jungle or jax. jungle but they already have things that make them good at being jungle. warwick or shyvana maybe is the best but still more gap closers than trundle. and rage blade is fin and dandy but would you really want that on any non hybrid?

Maximum Morde1 votes

You'd have a harder time actually listing out auto attack based champions that wouldn't benefit from building rageblade other than some of the ADCs and possibly Olaf. Even they could use it though. It's on-hit damage is super high.

muhandas razil1 votes

it is strong I won't deny that but it's like thunderlords right now. you probably shouldn't get thunderlords on yasuo right now but hey if everyone else is doing it. or it adds some stats then why not? on mele champs that item slot could be used for a tanky item or a better attack speed item like blade of the ruind king or maw. sure it gives great ad and attack speed plus some on hit but its like a gold car without wheels it looks cool but it never goes very far

Maximum Morde1 votes

In truth it's the synergy it has with devourer that makes it a must buy. Without devourer there are other options equally as good. With devourer, nothing else comes close though.

More from Gameplay