ARURF should have an earlier surrender

Lonewolfeee·Jul 8, 2018·9 votes·6,365 views

90% of ARURF games are decided before the game started. We require an earlier surrender.. 5minutes is what it takes to decide in ARURF who wins. (Mostly it doesnt require the game to start at all) So I would say instant surrender or atleast have it at the 5 minute mark. The game has 80%cooldoown reduction on actives and stuff, why not just take 80% of the original 20minutes. that mean 4minutes, and 3 would be early surrender. Even have an 80% cooldown on how often u can ask for a surrender after it was denied. The gamemode is too fast phased to just have the basic surrender and cooldown times. This way you could escape bad matchups early on, and go into a new game where you might have some fun.

8 Comments

Bob the ToastrJul 8, 20187 votes

Totally agree. Games are probably at least 50% based on which team RNGesus likes better and another 40% based on who does the best cheese strat in the first minute.

gileskdJul 8, 20184 votes

it should be 10 minutes

Shazzbot69Jul 8, 20182 votes

Surrender should frankly be removed from the game.

Pendergast891Jul 8, 20186 votes

{quoted}

Surrender should frankly be removed from the game.

and then we see the rate of inting/afk skyrocket

Shazzbot69Jul 8, 20182 votes

{quoted}

and then we see the rate of inting/afk skyrocket

you got no evidence to back that up, while I got evidence to back up no surrender buttom being fine. Check mate.

OleandervineJul 9, 20181 votes

People already int or afk when surrenders fail, or more commonly, they completely ignore the enemy team and split push or occupy themselves doing something else, deliberately avoiding and letting the enemies crash into the nexus. So while you may think surrender is "bad," if people have already given up, there's very little you can do to turn it around.