We should consider 20 ban system

The Crooked 1·3/3/2020, 11:52:37 PM·1 votes·2,798 views

if each player banned 2 champions at 20 and pick 10 for the game at 148 champions you still have 118 champions left over to choose from not to mention there are too many champions that fill the same roll if I ban darius they can play mordekaiser or garen with very little variation in gamplay

10 Comments

Bârd3/4/2020, 12:15:52 AM7 votes

Maybe we should just stop releasing new champions.

Tanerian3/4/2020, 12:43:48 AM6 votes

This would require you own 30 champions to enter ranked/draft games.

I'm all for more bans tho. First wave of bans at the start. Second wave a bans half way through the picks.

Sister meow3/4/2020, 12:08:43 AM4 votes

in before some dumdum with no idea what an outlier is says that "herp dep then everynody would play the next 10 most broken champs"

NuggetMilk3/4/2020, 6:36:13 AM2 votes

I am 100% in support of this.

DiveAlive3/4/2020, 2:34:43 AM2 votes

agreed

Vonyalo3/4/2020, 12:27:44 AM2 votes

With how much cancer champions this game has even 50 bans is not enough. Just play something broken yourself. Join the cowards ranks

Hazardus ducees3/4/2020, 2:51:43 AM2 votes

I'd claim to be the last person to complain here, but even if a 50 man ban were to go into affect, it wouldn't help out what really is causing the problem. Truth be told, there needs to be an auto ban system where S+, S, and A grade can't be picked or is auto banned due to those being the "Meta". If the array of champions are going to constantly expand, then the banning system needs to move along and compensate for what is "gained" equally.

Support Position3/4/2020, 6:21:36 PM1 votes

Pretty sure we need a 30 ban system with no duplicates.