if each player banned 2 champions at 20 and pick 10 for the game at 148 champions you still have 118 champions left over to choose from not to mention there are too many champions that fill the same roll if I ban darius they can play mordekaiser or garen with very little variation in gamplay
Bârd7 votesMaybe we should just stop releasing new champions.
Tanerian6 votesThis would require you own 30 champions to enter ranked/draft games.
I'm all for more bans tho. First wave of bans at the start. Second wave a bans half way through the picks.
Z3SIeeper3 votesHonestly right now you can blow through acquiring new champions with Riot's new leveling system offering so many free champs to new players.
Right now you have more than 20 just upon hitting level 30.
Sister meow4 votesin before some dumdum with no idea what an outlier is says that "herp dep then everynody would play the next 10 most broken champs"
Vonyalo2 votesWith how much cancer champions this game has even 50 bans is not enough. Just play something broken yourself. Join the cowards ranks
DiveAlive2 votesagreed
Hazardus ducees2 votesI'd claim to be the last person to complain here, but even if a 50 man ban were to go into affect, it wouldn't help out what really is causing the problem. Truth be told, there needs to be an auto ban system where S+, S, and A grade can't be picked or is auto banned due to those being the "Meta". If the array of champions are going to constantly expand, then the banning system needs to move along and compensate for what is "gained" equally.
NuggetMilk2 votesI am 100% in support of this.
Support Position1 votesPretty sure we need a 30 ban system with no duplicates.
