We really need 2 ban per game ..
like 1 ban is really not enough there's so much op champs and riot also makes new op champs ..... we need 2 ban every game 20 total.
52 Comments
How about just nerfing the blatantly OP champs?
Nice bots voting here buddy.
39 upvotes in 21 minutes, yeah sure.
I've been wanting this for the past two months now lol. There's just way too many champions that are either incredibly frustrating and anti-fun to play against, or just blatantly overpowered. My heart would be content if I could keep Ekko and Nautilus permbanned.
over 10% of the roster banned every game? seems a little much to me.
Yeah, 1 ban for something that is OP, 1 ban for something we hate to play against, easy.
Personally, give me two bans so I can permanently remove 
and 
from my games. Instead of doing a dice roll about which one will be played.
Might be better to have a rolling 3-day reprieve ban system in place that based on each previous 3 day window auto-bans the top 3 each of pick rate, win rate, and ban rate champions. After their 3 day removal from the pool they are re-added for the next cycle and another up to 9 champions take their place as bench warmers for a few days.
Got your primary champ auto-banned and you are a one trick? Wait three days and they will be back in rotation. Everyone only needs their one ban, but everyone is also given a reprieve from certain champions for a few days here and there.
And if a champion is perpetually in the 3-day auto ban lockout every other cycle then maybe they should just drain some power from that champion without a compensation buff.
This is so lame, this just makes it frustrating for players who have their main champ permabanned. Big no
2 bans is not enough I need to ban akali ekko yasuo qiyana senna riven fiora. And teemo nasus singed from my own team.
Pretty soon it'll be an hour long process to get through champ select just to have everyone remake because Ahri decided to go take a shit after banning her 3 champs and found that the spicy rigatoni she ate for dinner was more explosive than originally anticipated.
Bans aren't there to ban every broken pick. Just the ones you hate playing against the most.
gonna be honest with you.. the game has 10 bans and frequently in games i have teammates and enemies ban either nothing, or champs that have between a 1 and 0.1 play rate
are 3 off the top of my head that almost no one prioritizes in games and yet people ban (usually a frustration ban from a previous game)
so basically everyone wanting more bans has lost their brain plasticity and can't figure out how to beat new things. yes?
I wouldn't say op I would say not healthy for the game. They might have 50% winrate but they are hardcore annoying to play against.
Yes, or just ban aphelios automatically
Increasing the ban count would also increase the threshold before you're allowed in draft.
As it stands you need to have 20 champions unlocked (either bought or through free rotation) because of the unlikely event that you're last and all other 19 champions are either picked or banned.
Adding another ban per person would increase this requirement by another 10 champions.
Depending on the person this increased requirement for draft could be good or bad.
A 20 ban system likely won't work because then certain champions will just constantly be banned forever. Banning champions entirely should not overtake nerfing/buffing/rebalancing champions as a default gameplay lever for an extended period of time. (I.e. it's not acceptable to be told to "just ban a champion" rather than 1.) learn to play with/against the champion and improve or 2.) Riot rebalance the champion if it is indeed truly problematic)
Riot has reflected this ideology for years and has responded to this idea multiple times, this article below being one of many: https://nexus.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/2017/05/dev-10-bans-arrives/
The big problem that makes this change something that riot wouldn’t take seriously, with 20 bans it would be possible to ban certain roles, such as banning every adc, banning every assassin, or banning every tank, yes your team doesn’t get all 20 bans but it wouldn’t be impossible or unlikely to see large majorities of an entire role being banned out every game, this would ruin the game.
You people could have 5 bans per person (55 bans total) and you'd all still complain because that one sneaky champion who can counter yours was left unbanned, got taken, and somehow single handedly won them the game.
One part of becoming better at a game is to face what you fear and learn how to beat it. I, as an immobile mage main, DEPSISE seeing the abomination known as Blitzcrank in my games. But i did not learn to dodge his hooks by keeping him perma banned. I learned how to deal with him by playing against him. Same with Yasuo. Everyone and their mother constantly cries about how "bRoKeN" he is, but, shocking, you can telegraph his dashes by paying attention to your minions. Every champion has a weakness, but you just refuse to learn it, because you're too scared to face them.
Your suggestion is pointless and unnecessary. Learn to play the game instead of complaining why you can't make it easier for yourself.
If not that can we at least give an extra ban to another teammate if one of those 300 iq Chads don't ban anything cuz they're too good?
Inb4 people ban 20 adcs. Imagine how dumb that would be, let alone how long it would take.
I'd ban the following: Akali, Senna, Pyke, Diana, and Aphelios. Hate all these champions, not enough bans for the amount of champions being released/reworked.
We wouldn’t need this if the power balance wasn’t so damn bad in this game.
You used to be able to ban what countered you. Now you HAVE to ban the riot approved flavor of the month.
ide love to see a gamemode where each tam bans 10 things, and then pick one and the enemy team has to to automatically put it on their team