guess I climbed the ladder too fast

Your past statements: more games for placement and longer wait times = a more equal but less fun system less games and shorter wait times = a more fun system

Your current statement: all competitive systems are unfun and useless thats why you're crying.

are you even proof reading what you write now or are you frothing at the mouth so hard you can't even tell what you're fighting for?

By decreasing the skill gap does this not create more balanced matches?

I understand you about increasing the number of games to a considerable level in order to achieve a better balancing system, but I fail to see how this inherently decreases the amount of fun you have.

does not facing opposition that is greatly better or worse than you not take the competition out of the game?

How can you prove yourself a good player when you are judge on your team, especially when your team in more often than not imbalanced compared to you due to skill gap?

I consider fun to be a byproduct of competition. as such, it shouldn't be the focus. you meanwhile keep crying about how "unfun" this system is but have yet to prove exactly how an imbalanced, stompfest provoking, inaccurate skill measurement system actually results in fair and competitive play other than saying "it's more fun".