facepalm
Congratulations, you've listed off completely irrelevant data.
Azir's winrate over games played doesn't become anything even worth looking at until 50-125 games (~53%), which goes up to 54.4% winrate at 125+ games.
His wirnate over games played is a fairly standard linear positive correlation, which supports what I said about him being a hard champion to play but being good once you know how to play him.
The most hilarious thing is that you actually listed off data that completely disproves what you yourself said.
Azir's winrate after 125+ games is still a measly 54%, compared to just about any of those other champions you've listed. Wow, he's obviously doing so amazing, am I right? Most overpowered champion with experience with a kit too good for this game? On another note, I haven't seen a single person say those words... except you. Huh, food for thought.
About Lee, let's look at his winrate over experience.
Goes from 47.6 in early, plunges to 46, goes back up to 48.02, falls back down to 47.95.
Wow, what an incredibly amazing winrate.
Sure, he can punish mistakes and give peel if he's incredibly amazing at it.
Except... tons of other champions can also do the same, without having to take as many risks or as much of an effort.
He's bad. End of story.
People play him because they all think they can be that super-flashy LCS guy.
They can't. Why? He's just bad.
Now, for the data you listed.
It's well known Lucian is plenty strong right now, what's your point?
Voli's a good and strong tanky champion with decent damage and great sustain, what's your point?
Zyra's update basically put all the power into the AI which does everything for her and makes an incredibly harassing and bullying zoning tool that makes it near impossible to get near her without getting chunked, what's your point?
Karthus.... facepalm Sure, just ignore his 0.15% playrate or any other factor that would contribute to it, aka, matchups or item builds or the rest of his team. But sure.
Swain... "i don't like this data so I will pretend it doesn't exist" Nice. Good job, 10/10.
Gangplank and Nidalee have always been absurdly strong despite nerfs - or lack thereof in some cases. What's your point?
Anivia, I don't know much about her so I can't really say much.
Lucian, already talked about him.
Blitzcrank, you apparently don't know how to read numbers, because last time I checked, 56.98 and 58 were fairly different. His kit's fairly standard. It turns into "Can I land a hook?" If yes, they die (outside of Cleanse/Flash or something). If not, they don't. I'd assume people with that much experience have a good grasp (pun intended) on how to do that successfully. What's your point?
"Looking at the straight data is not all that difficult. "
Duh, I assume most people know how to just look at numbers on a page.
Except, you apparently can't read either, so I'm not sure you should be saying that.
"I can educate myself very well thank you very much and I advise you to stop valuing your opinions above actual fact."
Obviously, you can't, because your attempts to debate are still utter trash, and you literally quote data that disproves the crap you're trying to say.
I'd advise you to actually try learning something before attempting to try debating when you obviously don't have a clue what you're talking about.
And for someone (me) that apparently values opinions so much more than data, I've been the one consistently quoting data that disproves you... while... you just resorted to insults initially and quoted data that disproves you. Nice.
.
who IS the bottom :(
