Banning 4 champ's instead of 3

NevahMiss··8 votes·567 views

I think that, with the current system, you've got a lot of champs that are 'made' for ranked. Take the current Malzahar as an example, and maybe even lulu.

Over the years, a lot of these new champ's made it to the spotlights (New Taric, Ekko, Kindred, Kalista), together with the picks who were already amazing.

I feel like ranked nowadays is simply picking the best possible champ you can easily carry your team with (Malphite, Yi etc.), without focussing on your actual skill.

This is why I think we should be given more banning options, in this way I think ranked will be a lot more fun and a lot more challenging, since all the 'OP picks' are (mostly) gone.

Please, feel free to discuss down below

PS: If anyone knows, please let me know how many bans you could do in season 1/2/3 and how many champs there were at that time.

5 Comments

Ekkienatorzz1 votes

Great idea

Azure Hamster1 votes

Banning 4 champs' what?

Oh... you meant "Banning 4 champs." Got it.

Caitlyn

FinalFlare1 votes

If i remember correctly, they use to only have 2 bans per team, then around 90-100 champs they increased it to 3 bans.

I am for a ban increase myself, if for any reason just the fact that the first ban increase was after like 30- 40 new champs were added and since there have been a heck of a lot more than 30-40 champs released.

Jofeyy1 votes

This means that i would literally never be able to play Zed even though I've been mastering him for a long time only to have him become the most hated champ in league this season.

I guess i could live with that. Give us more bans!

Samflash31 votes

So second pick, second team gets the best of both worlds. To pick first AND to ban.

Other than that, i ageee

More from Gameplay