Works for me, Works for most my friends who are hard stuck. I just don't see folks whos MMR is within some 250 points 350 able to climb rapidly.
Your not presenting me any evidence I should change my rule. You cant really prove to me your beating diamond players. What can be proven is you have negative win rates on several of your most played champions. Your losing a gross % of games as
. The negative impact from those losses offsets the 3 champions your consistently doing well on. your own stats Main role Middle 58% Win Ratio 18% 2ndary Support 21% Win Ratio 75% Of the last 20Games 7W 13L and for the ranked season 8 35W 54L Win Ratio 39%
As we increase the number of games, luck becomes less and less of a factor. what you can rely on and calculate is personal impact. Nothing in your history shows me you have high impact on a majority of your champion picks, yet you keep playing them. Your call. Feel free to blame it on luck. Thing is With law of large numbers lucks going to end up in your favor or cripple because house always wins. If your a good player your the house. If your a weak player your the sucker. Bad players might get lucky, they will suffer for it.
The yas game your talking about I see few ones but non of them sound like the one your saying. theres a 11-15-8 yas who was top lane. his team won because it had
and the game went on until 38m 22s Their mid did 65,776 to your 37,570 Their ADC did less damage then their support. And Gnar was MVP on your team no you. Probaly not the right game, lets try again. 15/7/6 yas. That doesn't sound accurate to 2-11 and your a support so cant be laning him. Ah I found a 2-10 yas, but he is on your team and top. and you guys lost that game badly, almost like its punishing to be unskilled.(only 1 ranked yas game on that guys account btw. and rest of your team was awfull. Yas managed to do more damage then jungle or adc with just
and was only behind you by a few hundred points. by far he bleed out the most gold and was a huge negative no argument vs that. But the dude you vs was 10-0-0)
So, your memory is faulty, your exaggerating, your being dishonest, or you did not clarify that your example comes from a norm not ranked. all viable explanations pick the one that's accurate.
Yes Indeedy. Lets throw out my rule of thumb estimate because your telling me luck is the true decided of games in your personal experience, even if it runs directly contrary to my personal experience as well as some basic understanding of large # and straightforward applications of logic. You really dont seem like a credible source, if you can be accurate in your example why am I to trust you?
I'm saying if your feeling its all about luck that's the best time to hammer down improvement. Look at your stats, there are areas you can get better. You want to instead rely on luck, hell your making it out like its only luck that will help you climb or fall. Your call, your own rule of thumb can be the luckier team wins. I think lol is probably a bad game for you if you truly believe that thou. But hey.. your call.