Add more bans? Troll voter system? WTF is the most broken champ on live atm

lokergnome··3 votes·940 views
Patrick Scarborough on Twitter

Was curious on why rito hasn't globally disabled ryze and was responded by Scarizard with an interesting tweet. I was originally expecting something like "need a set accumulation of live data to make sure we nerf the right areas" but got this and made me think, yo WTF CHAMP is stronger than ryze atm? There is a champion that is more broken than ryze >> the champ who can all in you within your own creep wave and perma root you for 12 seconds? Unfortunately he wouldn't respond when I asked who. ( hehe a sweet mental game " Who is more broken than ryze atm?!" )

This brings me to my next topic... at this point in the game were we hav 110 champions + I honestly feel that there should be another ban making 8 in total simply because there is just way too much broken shit in the meta right now ( gragas, sej , ekko, ryze, hec, nunu just to name a few) >> and could also open doors to an increase in strategic diversity ( i.e ban 'x' players champ pool) .

Finally I also feel there should be some form of voter system implemented within the draft phase of solo que as a control procedure towards trolls. I'm not going to cry saying " If i wasn't trolled this game I would be challenjour blah blah blah" no... I've seen apdo and faker play league , I understand that if you're good you'll climb. But atm trolls can do whatever the fuk they want with no repercussion and I find this stupid.

9 Comments

Irelia Bot2 votes

Just take the Dota 2 ban system already Riot.

That way we can ban Orianna when Orianna is clearly going to be picked by the enemy team to make their comp way to strong in team fights.

It still allows for super broken champs like the current ryze to be banned out before being picked.

lokergnome1 votes

100% agree with this yo ! !

windwolf7771 votes

I keep saying this every time a ban order argument comes up. I agree completely

Thanotos Omega1 votes

Bans can not be raised it would kick players out of ranked until they got more champions if they choose keep to the minimum,

Such a system would be easy to abuse with 4 man premades voting out 2nd picks for not letting one of them have the role they wanted,

Irelia Bot1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Thanotos Omega,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PrBYtaON,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2015-06-08T02:15:00.503+0000)

Bans can not be raised it would kick players out of ranked until they got more champions if they choose keep to the minimum,

Such a system would be easy to abuse with 4 man premades voting out 2nd picks for not letting one of them have the role they wanted,

So you are complaining about needing 18 or 20 champs owned instead of 16? This is honestly not an issue for the people who really should be playing ranked.

And if it was the dota 2 ban system it is harder to ban one person out and is more about preventing strong team comps from happening then such and such is strong so ban them.

Thanotos Omega1 votes

plenty of people only buy the 16 needed champs and spend the rest on runes and rune pages, those people could need weeks to gain enough IP to buy 2-4 more champions, time that will hurt their standing,

Irelia Bot1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Thanotos Omega,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PrBYtaON,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2015-06-08T03:09:36.159+0000)

plenty of people only buy the 16 needed champs and spend the rest on runes and rune pages, those people could need weeks to gain enough IP to buy 2-4 more champions, time that will hurt their standing,

Several week ends of playing just to get a a few 450 IP or 1350 IP champs? call my crazy but that would not be that hard to do in a couple weeks at most.

Thanotos Omega1 votes

They shouldn't have to pick cheap champions just to continue playing a mode they were already able to play, Do you realize the back lash riot would get for players if they felt like they were being bullied into buying RP or Boosts to afford a champion they don't mind having? and i don't mean from the boards i mean from the millions of players who could care less about you wanting to ban more champions, and what about the reviews? how many people would retract their praise for riots free to play model if they did this?

Irelia Bot1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Thanotos Omega,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PrBYtaON,comment-id=00010000000000000000,timestamp=2015-06-08T03:31:42.495+0000)

They shouldn't have to pick cheap champions just to continue playing a mode they were already able to play, Do you realize the back lash riot would get for players if they felt like they were being bullied into buying RP or Boosts to afford a champion they don't mind having? and i don't mean from the boards i mean from the millions of players who could care less about you wanting to ban more champions, and what about the reviews? how many people would retract their praise for riots free to play model if they did this?

You must not have been around or not remember when free week champs were removed from being playable in ranked.

OR when the number of bans was upped from 2 to 3 per team.

People will get over this rather quick.

More from Gameplay