Majority Should Rule Surrender Votes

83sqojSQ6j·Feb 13, 2015·3 votes·543 views

Its always those last 2 retards who dont want to forfeit, not even because they have a chance, but just to be fucking cunts and annoy the rest of the team. Why must i get stuck with these asshats and be forced to "enjoy" the time I'm wasting with these fucking heathens from the pits of hell. How does 3 against 2 vote not count. Shitty ass system is the reason i rage so hard. How do you expect me to not bm when it feels like Im being forced to play the match. Its not like I can just go afk and expect not to get fucked in the ass by this shitty leaver buster system. I still don't understand this concept. Why be forced to play with people i absolutely despise?

3 Comments

RedTrinketGoneHaFeb 13, 20152 votes

I honestly agree with this, I and they KNOW we are not gonna win the game, but don't surrender cause #silver, even more reason to surrender cause I know my team is gonna fk up further.

83sqojSQ6jFeb 14, 20152 votes

I'm not even talking about playing ranked matches. Im talking about normals.

AnruiFeb 13, 20151 votes

I was going to disagree, but then I thought about it some more and 3/5 = 60% while 4/5 = 80%. Considering the majority in a 5 man team is 60% of the team it makes sense. At that point it's pretty much a 2/3 vote.

OP has it right though, you don't surrender (well not in ranked) when you are just losing, but when you are playing with people who you despise and making the game completely miserable for you. Whatever the case is, if my team is flaming each other or shit like that, I'd be pretty ready to click surrender even if we have some realistic chance of winning just cause I don't wanna play with dbags.

I guess the reason that this isn't the case is that some people will seriously surrender just because the team is somewhat behind. People who are negative in ranked generally don't really raise very high elo (negative as in "we gave up first blood, GG I'ma feed we lose").