Change the Surrender Vote to 3-to-2 Please

Love My Yandere·11/17/2014, 2:07:06 AM·6 votes·1,563 views

I am so tired of playing Rank, Team builder, Whatever, and there is a Duo on my team who ends up feeding and then trolling when the game so its impossible to win because its basically 3v5 (for better stats 3.5v5) and will not surrender. This way atleast we don't get screwed by duoQ members for 60+ mins and waste our life

15 Comments

SmokingPuffin11/17/2014, 2:30:01 AM6 votes

I have won a ton of 3-2 surrender vote games. Like, hundreds. Many players react badly to one big play or lost teamfight.

That said, I would be comfortable with some special policy where duos count as one player rather than two, so it'd work like a 4 man vote if there's a duo in the game.

Nerohol11/17/2014, 2:44:19 AM4 votes

Majority Rules right? so 3-2 makes sense

Sukishoo11/17/2014, 3:26:54 AM3 votes

It should be changed to a majority rules effect, so if there's 3 yes and 2 no the 3 yes should win.

AwesomeChad11/17/2014, 2:14:59 AM2 votes

Sorry but this should not pass. Think about how unfair this is to the solo que players and players who still want to play the game. You have two players that don't want to give up but they have no power over the surrender vote. You want to ruin the games of players in the masses just because you think that you got 2 duo trolls in your game.

Zombiephil1/22/2015, 11:04:33 PM1 votes

{quoted}

I am so tired of playing Rank, Team builder, Whatever, and there is a Duo on my team who ends up feeding and then trolling when the game so its impossible to win because its basically 3v5 (for better stats 3.5v5) and will not surrender. This way atleast we don't get screwed by duoQ members for 60+ mins and waste our life

NO! I've already seen enough with 4-1 surrenders at 20 because the team didn't perform well during laning and thinks its already over. Every game is winnable. Unfortunately, people start asking for surrenders because A) They died a few times in lane B) The team has lost 1 or 2 towers C) The team is down 5-10 kills. Seriously, I hate when people want to give up so early. IMO, these are the changes we need to surrender

  1. 5-0 vote to pass before 30 minutes - 4-1 vote after 30 (You wanna spam surrender at 20? Well I'll just keep saying No and you 4 scrubs just gotta deal with it.)
  2. 3 min cooldown for team as well as 6 minutes per person (Ever have one of those games where the person performing the worst is the one that asks for surrender as soon as its off cooldown? Extremely annoying)
  3. Also, to counter the 4 man premade troll team (I'm lucky - never ran into one, but I've heard a lot of 4 man teams surrendering to troll). One surrender vote per 4 man premade. The premade will have a vote amongst themselves (If 3 of 4 people in the premade want to surrender, then that is one Yes, and the 5th player will have the 2nd vote. If only 2 of 4 people in the premade want to surrender, then the 5th player will not know the vote is even happening. That way the 5th player has 50% power and could end the vote at a failed 1-1 and stop the troll surrender from happening.
IwfiKe3qjM11/17/2014, 2:26:06 AM1 votes

the surrender rule now is minimum 70% votes...

mean that minimum of 4 from 5... (80%), 3 from 4... (75%) or all in 3 or less... (100%) that's from total player connected...

maybe if they change to minimum 70% votes in... maybe...

5 players... 3 agree, 1 disagree, 1 abstain... still count... 5 players... 3 agree, 2 abstain... still count... 5 players... 3 agree, 2 disagree... failed...

since i am spectating some match that all 5 players connected yet still failed to surrender with only 3-1 or even 3-0 votes...

AloneInTheCrowd11/17/2014, 5:11:16 PM1 votes

I am so tired of playing Rank, Team builder, Whatever, and there is a Duo on my team who ends up feeding and then trolling when the game so its impossible to win because its basically 3v5 (for better stats 3.5v5) and will not surrender. This way atleast we don't get screwed by duoQ members for 60+ mins and waste our life

There is a possibility to win every game , so stop being a toxic nerd and get with the program .

Lord Dusteon11/17/2014, 2:12:48 AM1 votes

So you want 3 people to get to decide whether or not a game will still be played, instead of a good majority.