I am so tired of playing Rank, Team builder, Whatever, and there is a Duo on my team who ends up feeding and then trolling when the game so its impossible to win because its basically 3v5 (for better stats 3.5v5) and will not surrender. This way atleast we don't get screwed by duoQ members for 60+ mins and waste our life
SmokingPuffin6 votesI have won a ton of 3-2 surrender vote games. Like, hundreds. Many players react badly to one big play or lost teamfight.
That said, I would be comfortable with some special policy where duos count as one player rather than two, so it'd work like a 4 man vote if there's a duo in the game.
Nerohol4 votesMajority Rules right? so 3-2 makes sense
Sukishoo3 votesIt should be changed to a majority rules effect, so if there's 3 yes and 2 no the 3 yes should win.
AwesomeChad2 votesSorry but this should not pass. Think about how unfair this is to the solo que players and players who still want to play the game. You have two players that don't want to give up but they have no power over the surrender vote. You want to ruin the games of players in the masses just because you think that you got 2 duo trolls in your game.
Stephenizgod3 votesSo the majority (3) is out-voted by the minority (2)? How does that make sense, 3 votes should definitely beat 2 votes, if i know my numbers right...
Love My Yandere1 votesThink about how unfair this is to the solo que players and players who still want to play the game.
The point of this is for when the SoloQ players want to surrender because of the DuoQ people are trolling... It is easy to tell if a duo is trolling... So 3 people have to wait 60 mins to actually get into THE NEXT QUEUE just for a chance to win, to have fun, just because the DuoQ people decides to troll? The only people who wants to keep playing that game is the enemy team that purposely stalls it out to 60+ mins and the 2 trolls.
AwesomeChad1 votesI don't think you understand that you're asking for a big change that affects more than just your game with 2 trolls. The vote system should remain as it currently is because it requires that BOTH majority vote and only 1 person voting in opposition results in a surrender. Sorry, your logic is still flawed in thinking that riot should change something this big and important that will affect more players than just your case. If you have a problem with their trolling, you can always report them at the end of the game.
Love My Yandere2 votesIf you have a problem with their trolling, you can always report them at the end of the game.
Yeah I do and then a week, 2 weeks, a month later I still run into the same people who trolls agains...
Lord Dusteon1 votesSo you want 3 people to get to decide whether or not a game will still be played, instead of a good majority.
Stephenizgod2 votesAs it is only 2 people get to decide whether you surrender or not, so basically 2 people are holding the other 3 "hostage". Makes no sense.... Personally i think it should be at least 4 votes to surrender the first 1-2 times then after that it should be only 3 votes to surrender.
I am also sick of 65+ min games of the other team destroying us over and over again because its fun for them, its not fun for me and id rather get to another game that will be more fun.
Sukishoo4 votes3 of 5 is a good majority... anything less is bad.
IwfiKe3qjM1 votesthe surrender rule now is minimum 70% votes...
mean that minimum of 4 from 5... (80%), 3 from 4... (75%) or all in 3 or less... (100%) that's from total player connected...
maybe if they change to minimum 70% votes in... maybe...
5 players... 3 agree, 1 disagree, 1 abstain... still count... 5 players... 3 agree, 2 abstain... still count... 5 players... 3 agree, 2 disagree... failed...
since i am spectating some match that all 5 players connected yet still failed to surrender with only 3-1 or even 3-0 votes...
AloneInTheCrowd1 votesI am so tired of playing Rank, Team builder, Whatever, and there is a Duo on my team who ends up feeding and then trolling when the game so its impossible to win because its basically 3v5 (for better stats 3.5v5) and will not surrender. This way atleast we don't get screwed by duoQ members for 60+ mins and waste our life
There is a possibility to win every game , so stop being a toxic nerd and get with the program .
Love My Yandere2 votesThere is a possibility to win every game , so stop being a toxic nerd and get with the program .
Wow so damn toxic bro.
By the way how is saying
I am so tired of playing Rank, Team builder, Whatever, and there is a Duo on my team who ends up feeding and then trolling when the game so its impossible to win because its basically 3v5 (for better stats 3.5v5) and will not surrender. This way atleast we don't get screwed by duoQ members for 60+ mins and waste our life
Toxic? Sure the game could of been winnable if I knew they were going to troll from the beginning. But because I did not they the enemy realize it was a 3v5 and stomp early game because of it and because I am a good player trying to win the game still, the game stalls to 60+ mins of me not wanting to play but being forced to.
The fact you said this means you are probably toxic and one of the trolls in this DuoQ situation because you clearly do not know what the word toxic means
Zombiephil1 votesI am so tired of playing Rank, Team builder, Whatever, and there is a Duo on my team who ends up feeding and then trolling when the game so its impossible to win because its basically 3v5 (for better stats 3.5v5) and will not surrender. This way atleast we don't get screwed by duoQ members for 60+ mins and waste our life
NO! I've already seen enough with 4-1 surrenders at 20 because the team didn't perform well during laning and thinks its already over. Every game is winnable. Unfortunately, people start asking for surrenders because A) They died a few times in lane B) The team has lost 1 or 2 towers C) The team is down 5-10 kills. Seriously, I hate when people want to give up so early. IMO, these are the changes we need to surrender