Boards›Gameplay

BRING BACK THE URF WITHOUT ARAMS WITH ALLOWANCE FOR MORE BANS! AND WHY CAN'T THE JG BE EASIER????

KILLER JOBE··2 votes·1,475 views

It's extremely annoying to be force to play champs that either sucks for surf, or you overall just suck with. It's also annoying for people to be on your team who sucks bc they playing champs that they don't know. So then they feed and team gets tilted and now it's a toxic game. Let's try to eliminate that by allowing the players to choose who they want to use. For balance though just allow more bans for champs so we won't have to worry people crying about teams picking OP champs all the time as they should have a high ban rate. Also can we allow more rerolls? Two is a very small number considering you can easily waste them!

Can we try to make jgling a little easier considering the fact that it takes a bit longer to lvl up, therefore if you behind in jg cs ganking may be delayed which causes teams to whine and complain about not ganking therefore leading to a potential toxic game. At minimum can we at least get a smaller CD on smite??

11 Comments

BeatzBoyFTW2 votes

So you want the "Fizz every game, or Fizz banned every game" method back?

Plus, making URF ordinary is gonna make players play out all the fun they can, and then decides to not come back to League for long periods of time. That's bad business.

Arcane Blue Boi2 votes

now its fizz every game, no method of removing it

by fizz i mean fizz, zed, jax,...

KILLER JOBE1 votes

Again, if you are one of those guys who is concerned with OP champs every game, then allow more bans so you can ban the one's you are scared of unbalancing the game. Problem solved.

Infernape1 votes

And when the next best picks are the only thing in game, what then? More bans?

KILLER JOBE1 votes

Essentially yes, bans are for those who are afraid of OP champs(zed, fizz ,max etc,) the fact that free picking champs would increase games with broken champs, allowance of more bans are to ensure that the utilization of OP champs aren't an every game thing therefore decreasing the chance to become bored faster of using the same champs over and over.

Arcane Blue Boi1 votes

urf isnt suppost to be balanced imo. Its suppost to be what it is. As long as there are no 1 champion perma ccs, it can me considered balanced. The fun of urf is to be broken in your own way; of course there is some few champions that are more op than most, but those would usually get banned with the 3 ban system: with the 5 ban system that wouldnt be a problem at all

KILLER JOBE1 votes

Well I was just mentioning the fact of forcefully playing champs that sucks for URF, even though its to suppose to be balanced I don't see the point of playing useless champs in URF. What makes URF fun is the eligibility to play broken champs and increase your chances of winning more games. I say it's worth a trial and error report to see how the community would react. You guys are trying to call out mishaps of the idea ahead of time before even putting it into effect.

KILLER JOBE1 votes

I don't see the fun in forcing you to play champs that you don't use or the fun doing good with the champs you are familar with, but because your team is clueless with their champs you lose the game. I wouldn't say people have more fun with ARAMS URF seeing as there's many people who gets toxic and tilted due to the fact that they get stuck with champs that are trash in URF. That's another reason why URF should be regular. Fizz is only OP in URF when he goes against someone who can't play their champ and feeds left in right. But you can contest an OP champ with another OP champ which ARAMS doesn't allow. Tell me why waste time playing a ARAMS game when the chance for the team comp to be completely unbalanced stands? And with all the people that play URF/LEAGUE, I highly doubt business will be bad and fizz gets banned every single game. As i've mentioned before if using OP champs constanly is a concern, then that's why I brought up the allowance for more bans. Instead of 3, try 5.

Arcane Blue Boi1 votes

They said that people after playing URF, realize how shit the game is and some quit. As the costumer focused company they are, they decided it wasnt worth to bring the best gamemode in LoL just because some bois would quit

KILLER JOBE1 votes

Are you serious, URF is fun as hell, it was the main reason why I started back playing league. Even though i'm complaining about ARAMS URF, i actually had fun when I got the champs I can actually use, but the games where i'd go 0/11 due to unfamiliar utilization, or bc they are crap in URF I didn't have fun in. But then I thought if URF didn't restrict the players choices of freely picking champs, they may enjoy it more as they have a higher win chance. People say URF is shit though huh, could you tell me what game modes they think are better than URF because so far i've had the most fun with URF. The other game modes are fig stupid in my opinion.

Arcane Blue Boi1 votes

when people say urf is shit they probably refering to current urf (arurf) it kind of ruins the fantasy of ''wait... i just thought of a nice X champion with Y build in URF!!'' and then go try that gimmicky strategy. Wish i could play ''The Fast ™'', rainbow sona, alongside the champions i main, but i guess im stuck with a few random bruisers and assassins feelsbadman

More from Gameplay

3 Refunds per season, upvote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay764 comments
7,167
votes
3 Refunds per season, upvote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay156 comments
3,510
votes
UPVOTE FOR URF
Gameplay606 comments
2,440
votes
Yes plz.
Gameplay456 comments
1,721
votes
3 Refunds per season, up vote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay114 comments
1,716
votes
When is ANYONE at riot going to address the awful new player experience?
Gameplay634 comments
1,383
votes

More by KILLER JOBE

URF!!!!!! & JUNGLE!!!!!!!
Gameplay4 comments
2
votes