Full AD/MR Galio Rework- Full passive advantage

EternalDad·Mar 9, 2017·1 votes·2,688 views

I'm hoping to see someone who has access to PBE try this build on Galio. Galio's new passive has an empowered auto that scales with ad and mr and it would be interesting to see him build with the items that have ad/mr built in. These items would include , , . After these items you could build whatever makes sense. It would just be cool to see how he does with these.

13 Comments

Chaos Milk TeaMar 9, 20171 votes

item 3139 item 3156 item 3814 item 3001 item 3158 item 3083 Something like this. Maxes his cdr if you have 10 in runes. Wit's end has no AD, and he needs max cdr to reduce the cool down on his passive anyway since it relies on him casting abilities.

franchise7676Mar 9, 20172 votes

{quoted}

Something like this. Maxes his cdr if you have 10 in runes. Wit's end has no AD, and he needs max cdr to reduce the cool down on his passive anyway since it relies on him casting abilities.

i like spirit over warmogs

EternalDadMar 9, 20171 votes

I think in this case spirit does work better because it has the same amount cdr and mr and the passive can benefit the life-steal of mercurial scepter. I don't know his base health per level but warmogs potentially wont be able to activate passive with since the other items don't have health stat increase.

EternalDadMar 9, 20171 votes

true about wit's end, it doesn't really fit with others

Very Hard EngageMar 9, 20171 votes

unfortunately all melee attackers have been shown to be dependent on item 3153 item 3022 item 3071 item 3025 in order to stick to their target and do reliable damage.

making use of that passive is a mistake in all situations as he just cant stick, and if he does anyone else does it better with harder cc like stuns and knockups. galios only got the 1 E and hes not autoing at all if hes using his W.

EternalDadMar 9, 20171 votes

Just watched a video where AnkleSpankin went 28/3/13 with AD Galio so everything you said was mostly invalid. Even if it is PBE and it's unbalanced. Sorry. AD Galio is definitely an option and has viability. You are just trashing the passive because you don't like that it's changing, at least what I'm assuming.

I looked you up here and on lolking just because I was curious and it seems that old Galio was and is probably your main. I'm sorry that they're changing basically everything about a champion that you love to play and you're not happy about it. In all of your recent board posts your are trashing the new rework really hard without any positive outlook on it. Galio does synergize with his own kit and he isn't useless and he does have pick potential, just maybe not at all like he is now. I know experience plays in a huge way as to why you view this rework from your perspective and while you do make a lot of points you are overall out of place when you use absolutes in describing the cons of the new galio. When he is released on live servers and time goes on maybe the things you are proclaiming over the rework may have ground but from my perspective you are just playing devil's advocate.

Very Hard EngageMar 9, 20171 votes

kk, climb and show me a 50%+ win rate

its the PBE, anything works and its the most grossly imbalanced diamond vs unranked you're ever going to see. it has to be consistent.

EternalDadMar 9, 20171 votes

I mean, I definitely won't get a 50%+ win rate because I'm inconsistent in terms of sucking and not sucking but I can't tell if you're talking about the general viability of new galio or if you're saying that you're good therefore you're right.

Then give it a chance in general whenever it comes on the live servers and take a break from being on the negative perspective of things and haunting the boards of people who are genuinely interested in this rework.

Ruin LanceMar 9, 20171 votes

sorry to burst your bubble but just because a diamond player goes on pbe against primarily low elo players and does good with an unorthodox build does not make it good.

EternalDadMar 9, 20171 votes

I didn't say it made it good, I said that it's an option that has it viability in some fashion. I know PBE is bonkers and unreliable information in most cases. I was just addressing the statement of it's an absolute mistake made by CrestKnight, which it isn't. Thanks for trying to keep me in check though, I promise I'm not a doosher.

Ruin LanceMar 9, 20172 votes

well you're kind of right in what you're saying but put that way, basically anything has some viability in some fashion because you can do good with almost any build if you're snowballing. I can try it on PBE but I'm almost certain that there's not much reason to do this build over a standard AP bruiser/tank build.