Hello,
from my understanding (True damage that would been mitigated) shows the extra "true" damage that you've done during the game. And (True damage dealt) shows all the true damage you've dealt. So how can "True damgage that would been mitigated" be greater than (True damage dealt)?
Was playing 
during this game and I've gotten simular resultat with 
All answers are appreciated
Tahminatrix 2 votesAnd wasn't the healing supposed to be the same as the true damage dealt as long as you don't get 
or that rune in resolve or hit by a grevious wounds.
Total healing is higher so grevious wounds is out of the question, if someone is taking visage or resolve with conqueror then chances are it could be a funky champ like 
who already have possible true damage and might confuse the game alittle.
Knazter1 votesI forgot to include that I was playing during this game. But that I've also gotten simular results on (Rhaast form). Wich both have some healing from their abilities, and some bonus healing from . So my guess is that when qonqueror is fully stacked it counts healing from all sources (quonqueror, and abilities that heals)
And because the healing is supposed to be the same as the true damage, it somehow tricks the (True damage that would been mitigated) to show a greater number?
I don't know if this makes sense, im just confused.
Tahminatrix 1 votesI don't think the difference was high enough to say "other sources" but apparently it counts modifiers towards the healing that directly comes from conqueror, like visage.
Unless you got like a huge massive difference when playing rhast that's way more than 2/3rds of true damage labeled and healing done ratio, 2 being true damage 3 being healing.
DeathBurst1 votesYou're right, "True damage dealt" should be higher than "True damage that would have been mitigated".
I'm just guessing here, but here's what likely happened: "True damage that would have been mitigated", with the old version of Conqueror, was actually "how much bonus damage did I get?". With the new version of Conqueror which gives AD for the first few stacks but no true damage, the "bonus damage you got" is coming in part from this AD, and not just from the True damage conversion. They might have changed the calculation to take that into account, but forgot to rephrase the tooltip.
tl;dr: "True damage that would have been mitigated" is probably in reality "Bonus damage from this rune", and it's the important stat to look at.
Knazter1 votesThe last few games I've played (Total Healing) and (True damage dealt) has been the same when I look at the stats in-game. But later when I go and look in match history the (True damage dealt) and (True damage that would been mitigated) scores seemed to have switched places.
I think it's only like that when you look at the stats through match history. It was just confusing when I first saw it, I thought something was wrong with the rune.
DeathBurst1 votesHmm, I mean, you got confused because it's actually a mistake in the UI ^^'
You should fill a bug report ;)