Boards›Gameplay

Surrender vote for feeders

Kieshwa·4/17/2017, 7:02:37 AM·2 votes·609 views

Why do people with a low KDA, e.g. Less than 1 get to decline surrender votes?

It's incredibly likely they're responsible for the teams demise and lack of moral, and it's super unlikely they'll be the ones to bring the team back into the game, essentially, they're asking the remaining players to carry them, which isn't fair on them if they're trapped for 20+ minutes and getting incredibly frustrated because those that cost the game insist on prolonging it.

If a players KDA is under 1, their surrender vote should be an automatic yes. They've already ruined the game, it's just unfair they get to extend it.

On a side note, why do abstaining votes count as a no, surrender votes failing 3-0 are ridiculous. Why does 100% yes rate on surrender count?

5 Comments

Sarutobi4/17/2017, 7:04:29 AM4 votes

So basically Supports shouldnt get a Surrender vote?

Ravenhale4/17/2017, 2:20:03 PM2 votes

Oddly I find it more annoying when a 1/15 player starts spamming the surrender option. Guy throws the game and wants to quit.

Copy Mirror4/17/2017, 7:27:43 AM1 votes

So your late game Champions start killing everyone and their KDAs force them to vote "yes"?

Lucasman4/17/2017, 7:56:48 AM1 votes

first argument bad, just because someone not feeding wants to ff doesnt mean the game is lost. But i totally agree with side note if you dont vote it should count as a yes

4th Chiming Lamb4/17/2017, 8:16:47 AM1 votes

RIP support mains, by your logic.

The last point make sense though. Abstaining votes shouldn't count at all. 3/1 passes if there's a leaver, but 3/1 doesn't pass if someone doesn't vote? That voting logic. Sense. It makes little.