[{quoted}](name=xLegendary Troll,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=7uhJdiAF,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2015-02-07T05:27:52.417+0000)
Win rate is irrelevant because of pick rate. A champion like Lee Sin gets picked 160,000 times while Karthus only gets picked 3,000 times. Is it truly fair to look at win rate when there is such a disparity between the two champions?
The best example is Urgot. Statistically, he has the lowest lose rate. This is because he has the lowest pick rate as well. Not many people pick Urgot in ranked, therefore the rate in which he loses is significantly lower than someone like Lee Sin.
So is the rate at which he wins. The better thing to point out is if there is a lot of players playing a champion, majority of them arent playing the champion correctly or to its full potential, making the champion seem balanced or even underpowered.