My Normals Winrate is 30%
Why is it like this? Will my mmr ever get lowered enough to where its 50%. Am i really in the bottom .0001% of people in this game. I don't know. Just sad that I'm this terrible.
Why is it like this? Will my mmr ever get lowered enough to where its 50%. Am i really in the bottom .0001% of people in this game. I don't know. Just sad that I'm this terrible.
Your profile says you are lv24, which is completely new. You dont really have a meaningful MMR yet.
Of your most recent 10 games, 30% winrate. 30 games, 37% 48 games, 40% 68 games, 43% 88 games, 43%
In the short term, it's incredibly expected to have streaks of wins and losses. This is a property of probabilities.
Play more games to increase the accuracy of your MMR. (also have fun, and learn) Don't pay attention to small sample sizes.
[{quoted}](name=Silent Gravity,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=4e1J3Ugr,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2020-02-16T05:12:53.658+0000)
In the short term, it's incredibly expected to have streaks of wins and losses. This is a property of probabilities.
False, when streaks are so common AND so suspiciously well distributed.
Plus, there's no statistical explanation about a fair system giving more stomps than close games. It's basically a reverse-gaussian distirbution, which cannot exist under standard conditions. Ie., their matchmaking is flawed, or rigged :)
First, ask yourself what streak lengths you would expect to see in a set of 20 games that were perfectly balanced.
Then, watch this short video.
See if your expectations align with reality.
[{quoted}](name=Silent Gravity,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=4e1J3Ugr,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2020-02-17T03:52:55.354+0000)
First, ask yourself what streak lengths you would expect to see in a set of 20 games that were perfectly balanced.
Then, watch this short video.
See if your expectations align with reality.
Thank you, but I'm a master's graduate with the highest grade in that kind of stuff, so more than a YT video I can repeat you this: there's no statistical explanation about a fair system giving more stomps than close games. It's basically a reverse-gaussian distirbution, which cannot exist under standard conditions. Ie., their matchmaking is flawed, or rigged :)
Bye bye!
edit: thank you to the smart guy who downvoted this for no reason: if you can't understand a topic, just ignore it or study more, don't act like a --- just because you've no clue about what's going on ;)
I'm not certain what you mean. Where in the process is this non-standard distribution occurring?
Toss a single coin. Oh my goodness, what a stomp! Tails totally dominated. Heads didn't have a chance! That must mean that the result wasn't random!
Same for me in ARURF. I'm not sure why matchmaking struggles so much to put together reasonable, fun games.
my winrate in normals arams and arurfs is VERY close to 50% and its not fun at all. in 90% of the cases its a total stomp on either side.
FGMs use a different MMR from normal blinds or normal draft, for some reason. Often if you play much of the others, you get matched with tons of really horrible players in FGMs by comparison.
Normals don't have a ranked system so it doesn't pinpoint anything about your place among players. If you play ranked and you are iron4 then you will be there but I gurantee you won't because you have to be basically AFK to get to iron4
Normals don't have a ranked system so it doesn't pinpoint anything about your place among players.
Not entirely correct: normals games lack the LP progression system of ranked queues, but it still utilizes MMR (Match Making Rating) to create matches with other players.
MMR is gamemode specific, so your Ranked MMR is independent of your Normal, ARAM, ARURF, etc. MMRs.