Ranked ARAM - minimum 100 champions owned

cCc Punk··3 votes·832 views

Oh you say aram isn't balanced? The 3v3 map isn't balanced either, yet it has a ranked queue. Oh you say not many players have 100 champions? Don't play ranked aram then. If everyone has 100 the champ pools will be more balanced.

aram is boring without the option for serious play. if twisted treeline can have a ranked queue, why can't the howling abyss have one?

7 Comments

Remnar2 votes

I back this. Bumperoni

Ruin Lance2 votes

good idea, let's make an almost completely luck-based mode have a competitive mode. is it really that hard for people to see the problem with this? lmao

cCc Punk1 votes

there's luck involved in hearthstone, i guess they shouldn't have rankings either

newbin2 votes

ARAM is not luck based. With skilled players the chance of getting a game that is over at champ screen is 10%. A 50 champion minimum is much more reasonable.

EndlessSorcerer1 votes

Alternative: Unlock every champion in ARAM even if the player doesn't own them.

cCc Punk1 votes

problem with that is all the players who strictly play aram won't need to pay for champs and that's bad for business

Incognonymous1 votes

Not without ARAM specific balance. Resets are not okay in a mode of constant teamfights. All Kha or Kat needs is ONE person to get low and they just solo'd your team.

More from Gameplay