Ranked bans

z0mbicidal·10/21/2015, 4:19:06 AM·2 votes·528 views

I feel it has come the time to increase the amount of bans allotted per team per ranked or draft game. I can honestly say, along with many behind me, that its getting old having to ban the same champs every queue just to have another unbalanced one fill the spot. This game has become so centered around tanks and juggernauts, as supported by some recent item changes, that whatever team with more HP wins. It's getting out of hand, and I think a way to level the playing ground is to implement more bans per team in champ select. The original 3 bans were good when there was around 40 champions, but now that we're reaching over 125...?

3 Comments

HentRex10/21/2015, 4:22:33 AM1 votes

Generally feels that there are always atleast 3 "perma-ban" champions in any given meta. So only professional players get to strategic ban. Wouldn't mind seeing 5 a side. Ok you want to play X champ top? I'll ban Y champ for you.

UBcrawlin10/21/2015, 6:22:23 AM1 votes

It's fine the way it is. If "everyone" is OP, then no one is. In my experience people simply misunderstand power spikes and when to take advantage of a weak point in a champions scaling.

z0mbicidal10/31/2015, 5:16:43 AM1 votes

Continuing on this matter, I feel as though this subject has not gotten enough publicity. We should continue this discussion as I feel it is a vital issue with the system, and should be adjusted accordingly to accommodate a higher capacity of champions.