Surrender isn't fair to people who want to get ahead.

F3ORA·5/29/2017, 5:33:58 PM·2 votes·408 views

If all 4 of your team are quitters there is no way you can win no matter how good you are.

How well you do on the ladder isn't determined by skill because of this it's instead determined by the apathy of new players AKA "noobs."

That is a fact you cannot refute.

If you want to change that fact you will have to eliminate the surrender option.

6 Comments

Live2LetDie5/29/2017, 5:35:18 PM1 votes

You take the L then move on. You will have games like this, everyone does, so you brush it off and keep climbing. Better to leave at 15 min and get in a game that you can win.

F3ORA5/29/2017, 5:35:21 PM1 votes

FACT: All people who surrender are noobs. This is a fact you cannot refute.

Shonjl5/29/2017, 6:13:38 PM1 votes

Im sorry, but its already stupid you need 4 people to surrender. 2 people have more power than 3 when it is suppose to be majority rule. So you already have an advantage in that case when it comes to surrendering. So no, your idea is dumb. If you are so good, carry your games, 4 people won't surrender if you are doing well, and using your carry potential on other lanes. If you are a fed x laner, go to other lanes and help them out, make the enemy jungler's life hell, do something with your lead.

What a lot of people that have that dumb never surrender mentality is while you may try to bash people that want to surrender and make them look bad, you also look bad to them. Having someone quit early is annoying, but want to know what is even more annoying? Having an ahole that never surrenders even when the game is clearly over. IF everyone on your team lost, move on, delaying the game is just going to get people into a ragefest, and while I don't condone people being toxic, they have every right to be.

I Love Thresh5/29/2017, 6:21:31 PM1 votes

How many threads are you gonna make bitching about the existence of the /ff option?