due to the amount of broken champs...
Lucian, Jax, Yi, Tris, Yasuo, Fizz, Akali, blitz, zed... To name a few
Why is everyone saying I'm horrible? I know how to deal with all of these champs. IT'S MY TEAMMATES WHO FEED THEM!!! That's why I need more bans to keep my teammates from feeding these champs and to keep my teammates from feeding as these champs.
Jax? Zed? Edit: Although I do agree we need more bans with the size of the champ pool now
I'm a D5 player, not top tier but I'm getting there.
Lucian, ban worthy but not permaban Jax, no Yi, no Trist, permaban worthy Yasuo, ban worthy but not permaban Fizz, ban worthy but not permaban Akali, no Blitz, no Zed, no
Obviosuly you just need to learn how to deal with the majority of those champions and play around them
3 is fine. Everyone has counters, rather than suggesting more bans, perchance you can either
Learn these "broken" champs
Learn to Deal wit these champs with counter tricks and the like.
Coordinate better with your team (This is a team game after all)
We don't need 5 but 4 would be perfect I think. With the large number of champions in the game I think 4 each is justified but 5 is overkill.
I might agree 5 bans but the list of broken champions u suggest is ridiculous.
lol
Jax,Yi,Blitz,Akali,Zed
how bad at this game are you? The only reasonable out of these to ban i guess is Jax, cause late game he is a monster, but others are so easily shut down it's not even funny.
Yi - counterjungle him, cc him late game Blitz - Ward and learn to dodge Akali - Her pre 6 is pathetic and if you ward and say ss, she will be useless Zed - 3 items in the game counter him (GA, Mercurial and Zhonya, so no excuse for not being able to build it), and about 50% of the ults in the game (And some none ults even)
I do agree we need more bans, but not for the champs you mentioned
out of that list trist is the only one really worthy and luci, the rest....not sure if you know what mr is or how blitz falls completely off late game or any common knowledge but yeah you mean we only need 2 bans
5 bans each? So one team bans Jinx Draven Trust Cork Ezreal the other team bans Kogmaw Cait Sivir Graves Lucian.... and that is why it is staying at 3 bans until you can't essentially ban out an entire role they need to keep the bans low.....
I think you and everyone else is looking at the wrong reason for more bans. 3 bans were made to counter back when we had half the champs. The reasoning we should have more bans is cause we have over twice the champ pool than when we started having 3 bans so I do feel it should be increased. I'd like 5 but I'd settle for 4.
I wouldn't mind an increase to four bans. Four bans could help increase champion diversity on the professional stage, as well. Leaping to five bans seems like it would be too much of an increase. Spending worlds watching Alistar soaking up bans because he could punch and headbutt at the same time makes me think that whatever build they chose to use for worlds wasn't the best choice. It doesn't seem like many of the pros have very deep champion pools, though, so I am pretty sure they are worried about what happens when Amumu and Sejuani end up jungling.
Okay so, as a Silver 4 player here's my list of permaban champions
Tristana
And here's my list of banworthy champs
Lucian Akali (because no one in silver buys pinks) Yasuo (cause he's strong, maybe not after the nerf) Syndra (solo carry champ, shuts down an entire person on your team then keeps doing aoe damage when fed) Any new champ in ranked (cause who wants to deal with people first timing champs in ranked)
And thats it, maybe irelia or ryze depending on what I plan to pick. Maokai still sometimes if I feel like it but aside from that there aren't that many banworthy champs
Remember when Renekton and Kassadin were near guaranteed bans each game?
