Title says it all . Janna is like 80 % win rate right now but teams keep picking Lulu before Janna, 'forcing' the other team to take the option that wins more games. Is the fact that Lulu is better pre-6 really worth the fact the Lulu has no built in way to AOE apply ardent?
lulu isn't just better pre 6. she's an all around better lategame option with how flexible her q is and how low her cooldowns get and that her ult heal can't be ignited and also is a massively useful aoe for offense or defense.
She's really good if you have an immobile marksman because she eliminates a lot of their weaknesses. Speed for mobility, shield and ult for defense, polymorph makes engages difficult. Of course they both have scenarios where one will be better. Janna might be better if you're running a double ad comp for instance since, as you said you can get an aoe ardent buff.
I mean.. the results do speak for themselves. Lulu is very good, but Janna is winning game after game. Passive move speed is underrated.
Polymorph is absurdly powerful against a single hypercarry teamcomp, when they literally have 0 dps for like 2-3 seconds.
Twitch ults out of stealth, and immediately gets turned into a squirrel. Rip ult. A lot more effective than what Janna has against that, due to timing mostly.
