Skip to content

Rift Rivals Winner

Riot··13 votes·33,579 views

Not since 1776 has Europe been defeated this badly by its North American counterpart. The NA LCS teams dominated the round robin and then capped it off with a clean 3-0 sweep from TSM over the Unicorns of Love.

Rift Rivals may have been just a "friendly" exhibition match, but North America showed up and cleaned house. In spite of jet lag. In spite of not sending the teams actually at the top of the NA LCS. In spite of everything -- they left no doubt that the NA LCS is the stronger region at the moment. 

Starting with the round robin, all three of NA's teams finished above the three EU squads. This includes a poor showing from the new Kings of Europe, G2, and the old kings, Fnatic. Though, lately, maybe Fnatic is the new old king and G2 is the old new king. Whatever the case, they did not meet expectations as both failed to reach the .500 mark. 

Banter (and TSM chants) aside, it's probably not wise to place too much stake into these matches. Just because NA won here doesn't mean they can beat Korea or China or Taiwan or any other number of regions. At the end of the day, Rift Rivals was more about pride than anything else. And with Worlds just a couple months away, maybe teams didn't want to reveal too many strategies. The gulf between the regions isn't so massive -- all it takes is a good day or a bad day or a combination of both to flip the script.

What did happen on stage, however, was a clearly outlined blueprint for dealing with Fnatic's Kennen compositions. Kennen's biggest strength is his ability to split push -- this essentially gives you three solo laners that can exert cross map pressure once the mid and late game arrive. However, that can be dealt with via double teleport compositions or strong engage champions like Ashe and Kled as ADC Kennen isn't as strong in team fights.

We also saw the Unicorns fall to crisp macro play and better team fighting (what was allegedly UoL's strength) from TSM. The one sided Best of 5 series to conclude the event showcased why so many people were excited for Doublelift to return to TSM this summer. They have laners across the Rift that have the ability to take over the game. Long gone are the days of Bjergsen and his four moving wards. This iteration of TSM would be their first to return to Worlds together and may be NA's best chance ever at a deep Worlds run. 

Hype is scary. But it's real. And not just for TSM. Phoenix1's jungler Mike Yeung made his international debut just two short weeks after his professional debut. He'd garnered hype even in those weeks thanks to his play on Lee Sin and Nidalee in particular. The rookie jungler has dazzled on the rift -- the mechanical plays were perhaps expected -- but his presence around the map has been a welcome surprise for the otherwise struggling P1 squad.

Prior to the event, many pundits and fans joked about sending P1, the 9th place NA LCS team. Would they even win a game? But joke no more. This is, as they say, the dankest timeline. A 4-2 performance in the round robin should give them ample confidence as they return to the NA LCS to hopefully straighten the sails on their ship. 

As for the European teams? It's certainly not good for morale, but it may prove folly to change their styles too much. Instead of adopting what the NA LCS teams brought over, it may be better to identify what exactly was exposed and then create countermeasures. A sample size of six games shouldn't be enough to cause an identity crisis. 

For NA teams and fans, though, an overall 15-6 record is all that matters. Any sort of argument Europeans can come up with are now silenced by the Rift Rivals result. At least until Worlds starts. This embarrassment will serve as fuel for the fire. Come Worlds, expect this storied rivalry to elevate to an even higher level. 

Until then, let it be known that NA > EU. 

Kien Lam is a content producer for Lolesports. You can find more awful great jokes and commentary on his Twitter @meanmisterkien. 

107 Comments

420 grams42 votes

"Not since 1776 has Europe been defeated this badly by its North American counterpart"

Miror B5 votes

[deleted]

III BAKURYU III 53 votes

Welcome to America, where we have different cultures, players, religions etc.

Xonra6 votes

EU doesn't understand that concept. There is a reason we are one giant country compared to a LOT of small countries with distinct cultures.

SuperGood WinGuy3 votes

NA isn't just USA but the concept holds the same for Canada too

SilentSkies1 votes

In America, we may not be the best at League. But we are the best at business, which is why the composite teams aren't piles of flaming garbage.

berzerkin19 votes

lol they were born in europe but NA superior play evolved them. EU better jump ship to NA clearly they are trash.

SH Azykan1 votes

sadly every single time an Eastern Pro region (LPL, LCK, LMS) comes to NA, they always talk about how our solo queue environment is toxic to growth and are amazed that we can get any footing in international events...

Xonra8 votes

Which is funny because everyone (including those regions) talk about how Korea is one of THE most toxic solo queue environments, people are just more mechanically gifted. The actual solo queue is terrible. And China is laughably bad to the point that some Chinese players play on the Korean server, and they say how terrible it is.

There is no server that is perfect.

Gwynder3 votes

"NA superior play evolved them"? Yep, and thats why NA has such a superior record at worlds... Bar the first (which could be considered the original NAvsEU Rift Rivals), how many semi's at worlds have NA made it too? I don't want to hate on NA too much, CLG have very good macro play, almost world class I'd say, but amongst most other NA teams there tends to be usually high kill scappy play, reminiscent of the LPL. Accross the board right now, NA most certainly has the better players, but I still think EU has the better macro style teamplay and that will shine through at this years worlds... Granted there are no surprise holidays pre-tournement ;)

BigBellBrute14 votes

{quoted}

"NA superior play evolved them"? Yep, and thats why NA has such a superior record at worlds... Bar the first (which could be considered the original NAvsEU Rift Rivals), how many semi's at worlds have NA made it too? I don't want to hate on NA too much, CLG have very good macro play, almost world class I'd say, but amongst most other NA teams there tends to be usually high kill scappy play, reminiscent of the LPL. Accross the board right now, NA most certainly has the better players, but I still think EU has the better macro style teamplay and that will shine through at this years worlds... Granted there are no surprise holidays pre-tournement ;)

Actually this past worlds, our record was 9-9 in groups which was the 2nd best of any region. EU was 6-12 which was the worst.

Xonra12 votes

But...but...they got out (of a group with Zero Koreans and everyone was calling the weakest group before groups started), and Then won their first game (against the worst team to ever make it out of groups).

Obviously that makes EU awesome.

Gwynder1 votes

BigBellBrute* In best of ones... Not really something to be proud of. It is the Bo5s that are the main drawcard and really show the strategical depth of the truly good teams.

Xonra15 votes

Which NA just beat EU at 1v1.

That's really all that matters.

We have the FAR superior record vs EU, and this tourney just makes it even more hilariously one-sided.

Snarfthesnarf3 votes

Can't you also say that Europe got stomped badly by North America (excluding France & England) in WW2?

Ailiekpai2 votes

No, because the war was won on the eastern front, aka Russia. The Americans aided both sides until they realized joining the allies toward the end would be better for business.

ThisGuy9163 votes

The germans actually beat themselves burning all the food and shelter behind them on the invasion to russia. when the russian winter hit they had no where to go and no supplies to deal with the weather. all the russians did was waited a few months til they were weak and set up a flank. aka gank haha

ThisGuy9163 votes

what does ww2 have to do with anything anyway? at the end of the day we're all human same internals we all think for the most part a like. i don't get the relation of war and league of legends

AeonsLegend4 votes

LoL, Americans still believe their own propaganda that they beat the Germans in WW2 singlehandedly. Read the history books punks. Your best friends the Russians were the ones that actually beat the Germans.

Bradley9166 votes

russia and the united states are not friends. you ever heard of the cold war?

Maha22 votes

Who's more free, America on the 4th of July, or Europe, on the 5th thru 8th?

trex10176pika1 votes

Can't really tell... but they're both pretty damn free

3H3 Valk1 votes

summoner 13

Miror B2 votes

While NA may have won this event, EU still sorta has the last laugh in the form of a #1 seed for the actually important tournament. [zombie-brand-clap]

3Ddestroyer39 votes

But it doesn't matter if you get a 1st seed or not if you're just going to get smashed by the other regions :P

trex10176pika1 votes

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

redfuryin24 votes

number 1 seeds mean so much when you get spanked.. and not beat, i mean spanked. P1 finished 4-2.. the 8th place team in NA finished better than fnatic g2 and UOL. just goes to show how stacked NA is right now.

TZG HonorCore4 votes

stacked with players from other regions......

Curundil36 votes

So what? It's not like NA has a bunch of professional Native American League of Legends players dying to be put on a team; everyone in North America is sort of from another country. And the EU LCS has a decent number of Korean players. Plus, the team that dropped one game? Bjergsen and Svenskeren grew way more in NA than they ever did in Europe. Typical of a LoL player to come up with such a weightless excuse for a loss.

Xonra7 votes

I'd disagree with Sven, but Bjerg has played longer in NA than EU by a good amount at this point.

Reaxetion2 votes

.... you... I... but... YOU ARE A LOL PLAYER?! I mean, yes, your points were all 100% valid... until that last sentence... [zombie-brand-facepalm]

EvilMerodach1 votes

Did not know till this comment that I want a pro team named Redbone, made of actual Native's.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvqMvxdZTVE

Sicom12 votes

P1 is 3/5 NA. C9 is 3/5 NA. TSM has had Bjergsen for so many years is it even fair to say he's from another region? Even Sven has been on TSM for a couple years now. The rest of TSM is NA. CLG, first place NA now, is 100% NA.

PKThunder2478 votes

Huhi is not american, but other than that your points are right.

XxRamenBoyxX11 votes

Let's be honest though. EU's greatest world's run was when Huni and Reignover were on FNC. Can't deny that. If you can't beat them get some help lol. EU is just salty that they suck at integrating international players into their team.

Killing Jupiter1 votes

I mean if we're being honest here, season 1 Fnatic did take worlds. it was a different game then, and much smaller, but they did win. I'd say that's a better run than losing in the semi-finals.

Xonra3 votes

There were less than half the regions back then too (no Koreans and so on). Not exactly sure that counts.

Gwynder3 votes

How is that, they have only missed 1 semi-final... Maybe, you mean their greatest chance? But I would argue that was season 2 with CLG EU and M5. I don't really consider Season 1 as any sort of benchmark.

PKThunder2471 votes

S3 Fnatic was also pretty strong. While I don't think they would've won, definitely feel like they could've made finals with rekkles had he been allowed to play.

Also I don't think it's the inability to integrate, but moreso that most of the best players on NA teams are the imports whereas most of the best EU players are from Europe. Kudos to NA for being able to make it work, but the ball is in their court again like last year.

BigBellBrute11 votes

{quoted}

stacked with players from other regions......

We stole them fair and square. It's not our fault they like us best.

PKThunder2473 votes

Money helps. It's also how China has gotten so many Korean players.

III BAKURYU III 4 votes

Indeed, but EU #1 seeds typically don't show up at Worlds anyhow.

PKThunder2471 votes

Neither have NA teams. We all know it's going to be another Korean team winning and likely Korea vs. Korea finals again. The gap hasn't closed at all between Korea and the rest of the regions. NA has only outperformed EU at Worlds once, which was Season 4.

KeyboardWarrior31 votes

congratulations to LCK coming 2nd in RR asia. wondering if all players have made it back yet " if we dont 3-0 lpl, we r swimming back to korea"

NeoDeimos2 votes

Except that you forget that both TSM and CLG went 1-1 in their group matches vs Korean teams (Samsung and ROX respectively). The reason TSM and CLG didn't make it out of groups is because they didn't beat the OTHER teams in their groups. C9, however, went 0-2 vs SKT, but did well enough against the others in their group to make it to the quarterfinals before falling to SSG (more on this later)

NA greatly out-performed EU just last year (CLG 2-0 G2, TSM 2-0 Splyce). The reason why H2K made it to semis is because they had the weakest group (no Koreans or NA teams, and a Chinese team that has always under-performed in international play), AND played a wild-card team in the quarters. Who did H2K fall against? SSG, the same team that C9 lost to... i.e. it's quite likely that, had the situations been reversed, C9 would make semis and lose the same way H2K did.

It all comes down to luck of the draw; and frankly, if you don't win worlds, it doesn't matter if you lose in either the quarters or semis, because you didn't win the big prize at the end.

PKThunder2471 votes

It does come down to luck of the draw. That's why TSM made it out of groups in season 4. Also head to head is not the only indicator that can be used. Last year can be subjective, but you can also look at it this way. CLG lost to the same team that H2k dominated. NA and EU both got one team out of groups last year. You can say EU got lucky because of the H2K draw, but then how come CLG couldn't make it out of their group. The only decent NA team at worlds last year was TSM so using no NA teams as an indicator of group difficulty is way off the mark. Also I can make the argument that C9 got super lucky because Flash Wolves, who was a better team threw two of their games, which would've gotten them out of that group.

And yeah, very true that if you don't win worlds it doesn't mean anything. I expect more of the same this year at worlds as we've seen in years past.

GForce9x12 votes

Not having a #1 seed could actually benefit NA since there is a chance that their top team could end up in the same group with EU's #1 team, which given the performance at RR may as well be another wildcard team.

Xonra4 votes

This is usually one of those "yeah yeah" disses, but given that Nas number 8 team (let that sink in) went 4-2, and both loses were VERY close with Fnatic (and one at least they got cocky and threw), I'd say, yeah, EU looks terrible right now.

So much for their "superior brains" and "superior strategies".

The Lexer2 votes

Yeah, and remember that NA's number 8 team is also 3-2 in NA with that roster and recently beat IMT, the former number 1 team. By the end of the season, they will be much higher than number 8

More from Esports