Game 1 was textbook perfection by SSG.
Such amazing play by SSG, H2K seemed way to concerned about picking up kills and completely dropped the ball on everything else.
Such amazing play by SSG, H2K seemed way to concerned about picking up kills and completely dropped the ball on everything else.
You mean...except giving up first blood randomly and lot of things?
It was a good game but not even near perfection hahaha
You mean...except giving up first blood randomly and lot of things?
It was a good game but not even near perfection hahaha
FB and kills in general are meaningless compared to objectives, H2K was 2-3 kills up the whole game but CONSTANTLY 2-3k down in gold.
Well, that first blood was still a fu*k up by SSG. But yea, H2K mid/late decision making and objective control is significantly inferior to SSG.
EDIT: Also SSG draft is better and has neutralized H2K early-game (except Jankos, who is the saving grace of H2K atm)
However the third game tho... just broke H2K
Never said SSG wasn't dominating H2K, just said it wasn't textbook perfection...
Textbook perfection would be not a single cs missed, not a single turret that was hit even once and not a single death.
A normal perfection would be not a turret down and not a death.
They gave up first blood. Had some death (even if they did the smart move when someone was dying, a death is a death) and i'm pretty sure they also lost some turrets.
So no, technically speaking it was very far from perfect.
Even if we don't include turret, the norm for a perfect game is no death at the minimum.