I think it's not fair that TSM doesn't get the tie breaker. Both of the teams stand 3-3. So why should TSM go and not RNG. With the tie breaker it's a lot better. Similar how the the teams fought befor. TSM fought 0-2 to RNG but does this really say, that they are not able to beat them? Also in some best of five, one team was 0-2 beheind but then they were able to win. In my opinion should TSM get the tie breaker.
Your opinion is irrelevant. Every sport on the planet follows this ruling. And TSM were aware, that if they lose they're out. They simply didn't deserve to get out of the groups.
ok but even in a bo5, if the series goes 1-2, you don't say that the team with 1 in is the victor, right? right.
if you want your bo5 analogy to go through, you'd need tsm to get 3 straight wins over rng, and nobody has the time for that.
RNG is 2-0 over TSM
hush TSM fan
Bit confused as to what you're saying by this, namely how many games should be played between the two teams (aside from the two that RNG already won). If it's 1, then RNG still holds the lead. If it's 3, then I pose the question of "why not give every other team that option?". Give the 2 european teams the option to play 3 games against the two NA teams in their group. Then if the 2 EU teams happen to go 3-0, they'll both be 4-5 while the NA teams are 3-6 and dead last.
You dont think TSM has been humiliated enough, you want to watch them lose another game?
DavidDoppel10/9/2016, 12:33:04 PMI wanted to say that group D now has 2 teams on rank 2. But there should only be one team. Both teams are now standing 3-3. RNG got into the quarterfinales and TSM not. But both stand 3-3. I think one team has to stay 4-3 to get the seat in the finales
