Could strategic diversity benefit from more bans?
Hello everyone!
During a Discussion about the number of bans in Dynamic Queue, I thought about the influence more bans would have on competitive play. I couldn't help but notice that the currently probably best teams in NA, CLG and Immortals, both played a very similar comp every game during spring split. People tried to use pick/ban to force them onto another strategy, but it never quite worked out, there just weren't enough bans. That was especially obvious when Adrian's defensive supports were targeted. He just alternated between Janna, Soraka and Karma, and he didn't even play Lulu, another similar champ that people banned against him.
Now, in retrospect, we know what happened when they were forced to change their strategy due to a meta change. CLG succeded, Immortals didn't. We could really see how good CLG's skills at reading and playing the meta are, and we could also see that Immortals struggled with it. It was very exciting to watch them play something different, and imho a great display of skill.
What if we had that excitement of more strategic diversity every game, especially now with Bo3 and Bo2? What if we had enough bans to not only ban out specific pick/ban champs, but force the opposing team to alter their strategy? It seems like an exciting idea to me. What do you guys think?