2 Comments

Zielmann10/6/2013, 11:22:12 PM3 votes

There's some neat info on there, but it's really noisy, which makes it difficult to read/follow. While showing the full list of champions with their usage/wins/losses is neat, simplifying this down would be a huge help to make it readable. Perhaps how the top three champions for wins, picks, bans, etc. Then just do simple numbers to show 'x champions played at least once all tournament'. Basically... drop the 'champion overview and just show the 'champion details', perhaps with a couple more metrics if you desire.

I do like the way you presented the fastest/slowest time to different objectives, but the graph in that section has zero context, so it's hard to tell what you're really showing.

It's a good start, and like I said, some neat info. Just could use a cleaner presentation.

iainB8510/7/2013, 3:36:47 PM1 votes

Ouch, only a 60% champion play rate. And if you look at the above image there are quite a few champions who were only picked once or twice and never won. With those removed, we probably have less than 50% of the champion pool that professionals considered viable for the Season 3 Championship.

Really feeling the champion balancing team is non-existent at this point!