Boards›Discuss the Boards

I don't think the content removal reason is correct

RuFiot·10/24/2018, 11:00:41 PM·2 votes·2,777 views

The thread was about someone complaining that the ban he got isn't fair an the system (IFS) is not good

I have two tickets -

#Ticket One

Your removed content: I think the IFS is just one big SJW propaganda, "what the community wants", based on the tribunal (like its a valid and not biased data (not random + you get scores if you are "correct")), and now it based on angry people who report you cause you played bad and the IFS "learns" from it more of what it wants to learn

Reason:

As per the Boards Universal Rules, we do not tolerate posts that discuss:

Religion Sex Politics Any social issues, though some exceptions may be appropriate

  1. So saying "I think the IFS is just one big SJW propaganda" is considered a "social issues"? (Cause I still see here posts about PAX, I guess I don't get what social issues even mean answer me if it is the reason so I could go and search it )

  2. So with what would you have replaced "I think the IFS is just one big SJW propaganda" with (I guess you see my intent in that sentence), from another post I saw that signatures in posts are ok by you, and I thought maybe I should use my opinion on the IFS as a signature - some catchy and easy to understand 1-2 lines that send out the message that the IFS is just one big SJW propaganda (I guess I need different wording for that)

#Ticket Two

Someone said to me that one of the people which contributed to the system was Riot lyte and I should search about him (I was saying the IFS is biased and reading quotes of the person who worked on it ( even maybe a key figure ) is relevant to the subject)

I replied -

Your removed content: All I have find on him is people accuse him in cheating on his fiance with 3 different women lol wtf

<I have removed the youtube link it gets little NSFW for the boards I think >

(I have removed the link in my original post, not the moderator )

Reason:

Please do not hijack other people's threads. This is considered spam.

So my reply is basically in the lines of "I googled him and found irrelevant stuff" and every normal person gets that I'm asking for help and will just give me links to the quotes, so it is relevant to the issue, directly.

ps Good job on giving a reason and signing your name this time

15 Comments

ModUlanopo10/25/2018, 2:27:31 AM6 votes

So saying "I think the IFS is just one big SJW propaganda" is considered a "social issues"?

Yes. By arguing the IFS is somehow based on "SJW propaganda", the argument inevitably turns to defining "SJW" and propaganda. That's an inherently social topic as it debates the nature of society.

Cause I still see here posts about PAX

That's because social topics that are closely related to Riot and/or gaming are given an exception as long as they stay within the narrow confines of that exception. This post referenced Riot, but not closely enough to qualify for an exception.

So with what would you have replaced "I think the IFS is just one big SJW propaganda"

"I think the IFS is based on the wrong things and has a bad agenda." From there you could have said that self-censorship is not seen as valuable by everyone and how perhaps increasing permissiveness could lead to better game experiences. I would still think you're incorrect, but it wouldn't get moderated.

All I have find on him is people accuse him in cheating on his fiance with 3 different women lol wtf

This was thread-jacking, pure and simple. No part of the OP referenced Lyte - who has been gone from Riot for some years now - and this comment only serves to promote prurient gossip. Whether or not Jeffery Lin had an affair is not relevant to the IFS in any way, nor is it a fit subject for the boards.

Good job on giving a reason and signing your name this time

Are you just noticing the sig? It's in there every time and has been for years.

RuFiot10/26/2018, 7:58:42 AM2 votes

So I have patiently waited for Ulanopo to answer, it seems that he is active on the boards but chooses to ignore me, I think he did an obvious mistake and I'm waiting to someone to delete my tickets.

Can someone above him in the chain handle it instead (or tell me that no one gonna handle it so I could go on and continue to support)?