New Mode Idea: Multiple Champions Per Player

Aratez Treaty·Feb 24, 2015·2 votes·662 views

Sometimes if LoL, we may get put against a champion who we just suck against given the current skill set we just gave ourselves, and will suck at the game (or if you are some pro player, you might not have this problem, so good for you). So, each summoner gets two champions per game. They chose two champions, that must be two different roles (both can't have a main role of Marksman). Level experience and cs transfer over, but items and the abilities do not. Neither do stacks on items or abilities (you can't cs with early, then switch to a with 300 stacks, you have to build those up individually).

Maybe as a potential to not spoil those dominating with both champions, make their second champion have limited lives. Lives might be able to be bought for something like 1,500 gold, and gained on Baron/Dragon kill (if this would take place on SR and not a different map), and for every kill and every 2 assists.

Gold will be unique to each champion. Cs will transfer as bonus gold, but if you have 4,000 gold, buy a 3,000 old item, and then switch champions, you will not have 1,000 gold on that champion, you will have 4,000. This is to allow you to actually get a build on your second champion. However, if you buy lives for your second champion, that gold will affect both investments, so you must have 1,500 (or however much it would be, if you had to buy lives) in both accounts.

Also, Ultimate's (R) will not transfer over, say if you are a champion like who is also playing a .

This can be another component of strategy, because you can play tank one role, then assassin the next. You also can switch with your teammates. If your ADC is struggling bot, you can switch to an ADC if you chose one and have your ADC switch to a top laner if they chose one.

What do you think of the idea? Do you like it? Leave a comment.

8 Comments

SlytherMinnFeb 24, 20151 votes

They can't even get 5 v 5 to work, how are they going to get 10 v 10 to work?

Aratez TreatyFeb 24, 20151 votes

{quoted}

They can't even get 5 v 5 to work, how are they going to get 10 v 10 to work?

It would still be a 5 v 5, but they would be able to switch out. Yes there are complications since there are 20 champions that need to load, but that is why it is a **possible **theory on what could be done.

SlytherMinnFeb 24, 20152 votes

I'm still waiting on the theoretical 5 v 5 with no issues.

Aratez TreatyFeb 24, 20152 votes

{quoted}

I'm still waiting on the theoretical 5 v 5 with no issues.

There is always new content, and it is interacting with many different servers and computers and internet services. There will always be some problems, although those are sometimes the persons own fault, not Riots. Overall, even though the game is not perfect, don't you enjoy it? Don't you enjoy being able to present ideas that Riot may look at? Don't you enjoy it being free to play? If not, by all means people should do something else, but I enjoy it.

SlytherMinnFeb 24, 20152 votes

Your questions are irrelevant to the topic at hand. I disagree with you. Defend your position.

StephenizgodFeb 24, 20151 votes

Hmm this gives me and idea... What if every time someone dies the game gives them a random champion, they will have the option to refund all their items while they are dead for the full price and buy new ones.

I think it could be fun lol

Aratez TreatyFeb 24, 20151 votes

{quoted}

Hmm this gives me and idea... What if every time someone dies the game gives them a random champion, they will have the option to refund all their items while they are dead for the full price and buy new ones.

I think it could be fun lol

I like your idea. That would have complications too, but maybe Riot could load in the Random Champions ahead of time and have them prepared for people to switch. We wouldn't be able to see who they are, but they would already be ready, and experience I assume would transfer over. That would definitely have complications, so maybe if they chose to refund, they must have 1,000 gold or more to reject the offer in case it gives them a bad pick and they are the ADC.

Aratez TreatyFeb 24, 20151 votes

I'm not arguing just to argue. The situation is that there is a theoretical SR where there are no bugs, but it is not here with Riot, correct? They have trouble with a 5 v 5. My position is that I like the idea of being able to have two possible champions. My questions are relevant, because I am stating that you want no issues and me to get into a meaningless debate (I assume, sorry if I'm wrong). I acknowledge the issues and keep on playing, enjoying league for what it is, not theoretical, but a realistic, actual thing.

As for how they are going to get a 10 v 10 to work, I don't know. I don't know programming. Might take classes on it if my school ever offers them, but that is up to Riot. They may potentially consider something like this and potentially enact a mode similar to this.

How did you like my small, meaningless participation? My points are not irrelevant, and instead go to defend what I am setting as my point of the argument, that I like the idea of having 2 champions. I don't plan on answering to another "defend your position," but gl and hf in your LoL playing.