[New Splash Art] Lee Sin

ShadowKnight1224·9/30/2014, 9:15:47 PM·9 votes·19,105 views

Here's the new upcoming splash art for Lee Sin:

http://i.imgur.com/oLaLZJh.jpg

I'll just paste here what I said in another forum:

"You can tell a straight dude did the new Lee Sin splash art because if a woman had been in that pose, we would see her ass in perfect definition, while Lee's is mysteriously obscured.

Where is my dude version of Frostblade Irelia, Riot. Where is it."

With Lee Sin's popularity I highly doubt you would've turned off potential players by giving him a more egalitarian splash art, so I consider this new splash art to be a colossal missed opportunity. I am rather disappointed.

65 Comments

SVeUw4gMv410/1/2014, 3:34:49 AM12 votes

i think if he open mouth

He looks like more powerful

Z0R Kamui10/1/2014, 1:45:49 AM10 votes

I think the head needs some adjustments, I did my version, what do you guys think??

brusque9/30/2014, 9:30:13 PM4 votes

Wait, what? You are complaining that this depiction of a half-naked Lee Sin with rippling muscles that are so detailed as to have the veins outlined in them, is not enough? Wot.

Maybe the splash art should just have him striking down those parrying totems in a thong. Akali

HigeR10/1/2014, 5:05:53 PM3 votes

uhm hehe I find your points a little funny but I think they're really valid as well. I'm not sure if sexualizing an splash art just because is the way to go, my guess is no since the splash art is supposed to showcase the champion itself, sometimes champions have big boobs and those happen to appear in the splash art but also sometimes the pose will conceal said boobs, eg: Sona who had one of the worst splash art showing nothing but cleavage and now her splash have her in a more subtle pose.

What I'm trying to say is that instead of trying to sexualize men, the logical answer would be to de-sexualize women and instead make them fulfill their role/fantasy in their splash arts as well as in game. Can we have accidental sexy elements in both cases? yes please! and here is where I agree with you, a little more ass never hurt anyone but lets think a little bit:

-Who does Lee Sin resemble in popular culture? my guess goes to Bruce Lee and the likes, sadly, these men had no booty to shake, but they neither had big burly upper bodies so there's kind of a disconnection in there.

-Hows Lee Sin in-game? well, he certainly have always had these pants so it's nothing new, they do conceal the little booty he has but to be honest you can still see some of it. Riot can't suddenly decide he's wearing spandex when he has a certain shape in-game.

So I think this explains why I understand the current low sexiness of this splash art. With that out of the way, I must say I do not like this splash art, the drawing technique itself is alright, the pose however is just bad, he looks like a looney tunes character, almost funny, there's no tension in his lower body whatsoever and in order to break one of those things one would think you need to have a lot of strength applied to your legs, welp I guess Lee can just stumble onto things and they'll break. He's a disciplined monk he's not some rookie who's learning how to kick things, attention to body motion is important, especially in fighting monks, this monk is sloppy all over the place, his hands are flailing, his other leg is dead behind and his kicking leg is not even straight, where's the discipline Lee Sin shows in-game?

And of course there's the face, a HUGE change from current lee sin (LeeSin for reference) who happened to be a man with Chinese features, small nose, small lips, some facial hair, square-ish chin and rugged but not stupidly manly head, all in all great features that happen to feel somewhat Chinese (let's be real they have very specific ways when it comes to manliness) pretty much like what Yasuo has going for him, though in a different way. Now, Lee Sin is... Taric, or Wesley Snipes ._. big nose, big lips, weird and overtly big bone structure... wth?

Someone posted below the splash art with his mouth opened and I must say it looks way better mostly because it adds emotion to the whole piece, gets rid of the awful huge lips and makes the nose look smaller -.- not to mention it gives a dynamic motion to the whole body, as if he was trying to kick something!!!!

Sorry for the huge text wall X_X

L2 Sentinel10/12/2014, 9:30:26 AM2 votes

Well, I certainly wouldn't have minded if they went in a sexier direction with Lee Sin, I'm more upset that they made him quite ugly. He was a good looking guy before (and still is attractive in all of his skins). Now his icon is just unpleasant to look at.

We went from this: http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140930195458/leagueoflegends/images/2/2e/LeeSinSquare_old.png to this: http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/api/embedly/1/image/resize?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20141005013304%2Fleagueoflegends%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fbf%2FLeeSinSquare.png&key=a45e967db0914c7fb472fd4381e6c85b&width=425. That's a huge downgrade. It makes me wonder if Riot even considers what the icons will look like before approving splash arts.

They don't need to redo the whole thing, just the head. What ZoR Kamui and Kaloz posted are already vast improvements.

Lawful Good10/1/2014, 5:25:38 AM2 votes

I like the proposed fixes people have put forth here. As it is, I'm not really a big fan of the new art. His face just looks too off.

item 3070 LeeSin item 3070

Vythanar10/1/2014, 1:03:43 PM2 votes

The art itself is great, but I'm not sure it suits its purpose well. The icon for his head taken from this splash looks incredibly strange with the way his head is posed, imo,

cmjh62510/1/2014, 4:00:31 PM2 votes

Lee Thumb

IMTOOJUICY10/1/2014, 1:11:23 AM1 votes

I really like the mid-kick snapshot. His body is in a reasonably feasible pose as far as action shots go, unlike some other splashes out there.

Also not sure where you're going with the complaints regarding sexualization. The last splash updated with a groundhog's view was Sona's, AFAIK. I guess you complained about her lack of sexualization then, also?